Utility of PET scans to predict disease relapse in pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma
Background Positron emission tomography (PET) differentiates normal from abnormal cells based on metabolic activity. Numerous studies report that PET scan offers increased sensitivity, specificity and predictive values as compared to computed tomography (CT) in adult lymphoma patients. Procedure Twe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2007-04, Vol.48 (4), p.399-402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Positron emission tomography (PET) differentiates normal from abnormal cells based on metabolic activity. Numerous studies report that PET scan offers increased sensitivity, specificity and predictive values as compared to computed tomography (CT) in adult lymphoma patients.
Procedure
Twenty‐three consecutive pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients were evaluated with PET scan either at diagnosis or during treatment, then at therapy completion and in follow‐up.
Results
Twenty two of the 23 patients had a negative PET scan at the end of therapy; however, ten later developed a positive scan for a total of 11 (47.8%) patients with a positive post treatment PET scan. Six tissue biopsies were performed in five patients; four specimens were negative for disease and two confirmed HL relapse. Six patients were monitored clinically and remained asymptomatic; four had resolution of abnormalities on repeat PET while two had persistently positive, but stable PET scan findings and continue to be in remission at 11 and 40 months following treatment. Twelve (52.2%) patients of the original cohort have had consistently negative PET scans and have not relapsed.
Conclusions
PET is a sensitive (100%), but not a specific (57.1%) method for evaluating post‐treatment pediatric HL patients with a strong negative predictive value (NPV; 100%), but poor positive predictive value (PPV; 18.2%). We do not recommend treatment decisions be based solely on PET scan results. Pediatr Blood Cancer © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 1096-911X |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.20797 |