A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease

Abstract Background Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LAP) has become more prevalent as evidence of its safety and benefits become apparent. However, in difficult cases, hand-assisted instrumentation has facilitated LAP. We examined the impact of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) on the treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2007-03, Vol.193 (3), p.400-403
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Joel, M.D, Luchtefeld, Martin, M.D, Dujovny, Nadov, M.D, Hoedema, Rebecca, M.D, Kim, Donald, M.D, Butcher, Jefferey, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LAP) has become more prevalent as evidence of its safety and benefits become apparent. However, in difficult cases, hand-assisted instrumentation has facilitated LAP. We examined the impact of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) on the treatment of sigmoid diverticular disease. Methods This is a retrospective study using a prospectively maintained database from January 1, 2000 through November 30, 2005. Patients were divided into 3 groups: open (n = 110), LAP (n = 17), and HALS (n = 98). Data include operative time, length of stay, surgical method, conversion rate, and reasons for conversion. Results Surgeries started as LAP were completed in that fashion 59% of the time, with 23% being converted to open and 18% converted to HALS (total 41%). HALS cases showed a 6% conversion rate to open surgery (OS). Duration of surgery and length of stay were similar between LAP and HALS. Conclusions HALS should be considered the optimal approach for surgery for diverticular disease.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.12.005