Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic

Objective  To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method  Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2008-02, Vol.10 (2), p.118-123
Hauptverfasser: Kapoor, D. S., Sultan, A. H., Thakar, R., Abulafi, M. A., Swift, R. I., Ness, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 2
container_start_page 118
container_title Colorectal disease
container_volume 10
creator Kapoor, D. S.
Sultan, A. H.
Thakar, R.
Abulafi, M. A.
Swift, R. I.
Ness, W.
description Objective  To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method  Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measures: symptom clusters and treatment received; patient satisfaction. Results  A total of 113 new cases over a 3‐year period. There were two main symptom clusters: (i) obstructed defaecation with rectoceles (n = 55); of these, 23 had abdominal sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy, six had transvaginal rectocele repairs; and (ii) of the 33 with double incontinence, 10 had anal sphincter repairs, five had tension‐free vaginal tapes and two had colposuspensions. Patient satisfaction audit: 73% found the care to be excellent/good, 12% satisfactory and 6% unsatisfactory. Conclusion  Combined PFCs led to a more pragmatic approach in treating patients’ symptoms. Combined surgery was undertaken in one‐fourth of patients and is associated with cost savings and a single recuperation period. Overall, patients rated this service very highly.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01208.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70208868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-bc11a00dcb8a2747b45fa151ec370eb9b296f2dec806e8d17e9fe9621a5dd48c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P4zAQhq0VaPn8CyufuCV4nDR2LkhQaEHqwgXE0XKcycrF-cBuofx7HFqx2tv64tH4ncejhxAKLIV4zpcp5EWWQAYy5YyJlAFnMt38IIffD3tfNU9kCeyAHIWwZAwKAfInOQAJZclLfkief-tO_8EWuxXtG2r6dnC4oQO6N2to4_re09qG3tfoA7Ud1bRdu5WNPWMHZzvtP_5Nm9i05oTsN9oFPN3dx-RpdvM4vU0WD_O76eUiMTkrZFIZAM1YbSqpuchFlU8aDRNAkwmGVVnxsmh4jUayAmUNAssGy4KDntR1Lk12TM623MH3r2sMK9XGzdA53WG_DkqwKEYWMgblNmh8H4LHRg3etnF7BUyNUtVSje7U6E6NUtWXVLWJo792f6yrFuu_gzuLMXCxDbxbhx__DVbTh-u7sYyAZAuwYYWbb4D2L6oQmZio5_u5uhLzq8V8tlCz7BN56pZj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70208868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kapoor, D. S. ; Sultan, A. H. ; Thakar, R. ; Abulafi, M. A. ; Swift, R. I. ; Ness, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, D. S. ; Sultan, A. H. ; Thakar, R. ; Abulafi, M. A. ; Swift, R. I. ; Ness, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective  To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method  Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measures: symptom clusters and treatment received; patient satisfaction. Results  A total of 113 new cases over a 3‐year period. There were two main symptom clusters: (i) obstructed defaecation with rectoceles (n = 55); of these, 23 had abdominal sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy, six had transvaginal rectocele repairs; and (ii) of the 33 with double incontinence, 10 had anal sphincter repairs, five had tension‐free vaginal tapes and two had colposuspensions. Patient satisfaction audit: 73% found the care to be excellent/good, 12% satisfactory and 6% unsatisfactory. Conclusion  Combined PFCs led to a more pragmatic approach in treating patients’ symptoms. Combined surgery was undertaken in one‐fourth of patients and is associated with cost savings and a single recuperation period. Overall, patients rated this service very highly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01208.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18199292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Constipation - diagnosis ; Constipation - physiopathology ; Constipation - therapy ; double incontinence ; faecal incontinence ; Fecal Incontinence - diagnosis ; Fecal Incontinence - physiopathology ; Fecal Incontinence - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; obstructed defaecation ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pelvic Floor - pathology ; Pelvic floor clinic ; Quality of Life ; Rectocele - diagnosis ; Rectocele - physiopathology ; Rectocele - therapy ; rectoceles ; rectopexy ; Retrospective Studies ; sacrocolpopexy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence - therapy</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2008-02, Vol.10 (2), p.118-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-bc11a00dcb8a2747b45fa151ec370eb9b296f2dec806e8d17e9fe9621a5dd48c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-bc11a00dcb8a2747b45fa151ec370eb9b296f2dec806e8d17e9fe9621a5dd48c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01208.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1463-1318.2007.01208.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18199292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abulafi, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, R. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ness, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Objective  To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method  Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measures: symptom clusters and treatment received; patient satisfaction. Results  A total of 113 new cases over a 3‐year period. There were two main symptom clusters: (i) obstructed defaecation with rectoceles (n = 55); of these, 23 had abdominal sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy, six had transvaginal rectocele repairs; and (ii) of the 33 with double incontinence, 10 had anal sphincter repairs, five had tension‐free vaginal tapes and two had colposuspensions. Patient satisfaction audit: 73% found the care to be excellent/good, 12% satisfactory and 6% unsatisfactory. Conclusion  Combined PFCs led to a more pragmatic approach in treating patients’ symptoms. Combined surgery was undertaken in one‐fourth of patients and is associated with cost savings and a single recuperation period. Overall, patients rated this service very highly.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Constipation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Constipation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Constipation - therapy</subject><subject>double incontinence</subject><subject>faecal incontinence</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>obstructed defaecation</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - pathology</subject><subject>Pelvic floor clinic</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rectocele - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rectocele - physiopathology</subject><subject>Rectocele - therapy</subject><subject>rectoceles</subject><subject>rectopexy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>sacrocolpopexy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - therapy</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1P4zAQhq0VaPn8CyufuCV4nDR2LkhQaEHqwgXE0XKcycrF-cBuofx7HFqx2tv64tH4ncejhxAKLIV4zpcp5EWWQAYy5YyJlAFnMt38IIffD3tfNU9kCeyAHIWwZAwKAfInOQAJZclLfkief-tO_8EWuxXtG2r6dnC4oQO6N2to4_re09qG3tfoA7Ud1bRdu5WNPWMHZzvtP_5Nm9i05oTsN9oFPN3dx-RpdvM4vU0WD_O76eUiMTkrZFIZAM1YbSqpuchFlU8aDRNAkwmGVVnxsmh4jUayAmUNAssGy4KDntR1Lk12TM623MH3r2sMK9XGzdA53WG_DkqwKEYWMgblNmh8H4LHRg3etnF7BUyNUtVSje7U6E6NUtWXVLWJo792f6yrFuu_gzuLMXCxDbxbhx__DVbTh-u7sYyAZAuwYYWbb4D2L6oQmZio5_u5uhLzq8V8tlCz7BN56pZj</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Kapoor, D. S.</creator><creator>Sultan, A. H.</creator><creator>Thakar, R.</creator><creator>Abulafi, M. A.</creator><creator>Swift, R. I.</creator><creator>Ness, W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic</title><author>Kapoor, D. S. ; Sultan, A. H. ; Thakar, R. ; Abulafi, M. A. ; Swift, R. I. ; Ness, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4068-bc11a00dcb8a2747b45fa151ec370eb9b296f2dec806e8d17e9fe9621a5dd48c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Constipation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Constipation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Constipation - therapy</topic><topic>double incontinence</topic><topic>faecal incontinence</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>obstructed defaecation</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - pathology</topic><topic>Pelvic floor clinic</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rectocele - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rectocele - physiopathology</topic><topic>Rectocele - therapy</topic><topic>rectoceles</topic><topic>rectopexy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>sacrocolpopexy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abulafi, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swift, R. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ness, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kapoor, D. S.</au><au>Sultan, A. H.</au><au>Thakar, R.</au><au>Abulafi, M. A.</au><au>Swift, R. I.</au><au>Ness, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>118-123</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Objective  To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method  Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measures: symptom clusters and treatment received; patient satisfaction. Results  A total of 113 new cases over a 3‐year period. There were two main symptom clusters: (i) obstructed defaecation with rectoceles (n = 55); of these, 23 had abdominal sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy, six had transvaginal rectocele repairs; and (ii) of the 33 with double incontinence, 10 had anal sphincter repairs, five had tension‐free vaginal tapes and two had colposuspensions. Patient satisfaction audit: 73% found the care to be excellent/good, 12% satisfactory and 6% unsatisfactory. Conclusion  Combined PFCs led to a more pragmatic approach in treating patients’ symptoms. Combined surgery was undertaken in one‐fourth of patients and is associated with cost savings and a single recuperation period. Overall, patients rated this service very highly.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18199292</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01208.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-8910
ispartof Colorectal disease, 2008-02, Vol.10 (2), p.118-123
issn 1462-8910
1463-1318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70208868
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Combined Modality Therapy
Constipation - diagnosis
Constipation - physiopathology
Constipation - therapy
double incontinence
faecal incontinence
Fecal Incontinence - diagnosis
Fecal Incontinence - physiopathology
Fecal Incontinence - therapy
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
obstructed defaecation
Patient Satisfaction
Pelvic Floor - pathology
Pelvic floor clinic
Quality of Life
Rectocele - diagnosis
Rectocele - physiopathology
Rectocele - therapy
rectoceles
rectopexy
Retrospective Studies
sacrocolpopexy
Surveys and Questionnaires
urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence - diagnosis
Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence - therapy
title Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20complex%20pelvic%20floor%20disorders%20in%20a%20multidisciplinary%20pelvic%20floor%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Kapoor,%20D.%20S.&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=118-123&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01208.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70208868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70208868&rft_id=info:pmid/18199292&rfr_iscdi=true