Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic

Objective To identify symptom clusters, management strategies and survey patient satisfaction in our combined multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic (PFC). Method Retrospective cohort study, patient satisfaction questionnaire. Sample: Secondary and tertiary referrals with complex pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measures: symptom clusters and treatment received; patient satisfaction. Results A total of 113 new cases over a 3‐year period. There were two main symptom clusters: (i) obstructed defaecation with rectoceles (n = 55); of these, 23 had abdominal sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy, six had transvaginal rectocele repairs; and (ii) of the 33 with double incontinence, 10 had anal sphincter repairs, five had tension‐free vaginal tapes and two had colposuspensions. Patient satisfaction audit: 73% found the care to be excellent/good, 12% satisfactory and 6% unsatisfactory. Conclusion Combined PFCs led to a more pragmatic approach in treating patients’ symptoms. Combined surgery was undertaken in one‐fourth of patients and is associated with cost savings and a single recuperation period. Overall, patients rated this service very highly.