Randomized double-blinded trial investigating the impact of a curriculum focused on error recognition on laparoscopic suturing training
Abstract Background Error recognition predicts technical skill. A curriculum including error recognition may improve laparoscopic suturing performance. Methods Thirty novices were randomized into 2 groups. Each viewed an instruction videotape and underwent timed objective structured assessments of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2008-02, Vol.195 (2), p.179-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Error recognition predicts technical skill. A curriculum including error recognition may improve laparoscopic suturing performance. Methods Thirty novices were randomized into 2 groups. Each viewed an instruction videotape and underwent timed objective structured assessments of technical skills. Group A practiced the task, group B viewed an error-instruction video, practiced, followed by re-assessment. Participants counted errors on a videotape. Data were analyzed with the Fisher exact text, the Wilcoxon test, and the Kendall tau test. Results The improvement in task time was greater in group A than in group B ( P < .001). The objective structured assessments of technical skills scores improved for both groups, but did not reveal differences between the groups. Group B recognized significantly more errors than group A ( P < 0.001). Conclusions The additional error instruction showed a negative impact on performance speed, but improved cognitive error recognition. Whether visual memory overload influenced the outcome requires further examination |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.001 |