Plant-based formulation in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized double-blind study

A randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical study was undertaken to investigate the safety and efficacy of a plant-based formulation (DCBT1234-Lung KR), which earlier through 2 trials was found to improve FEV 1 and the quality of life of COPD patients. The efficacy of DCBT1234-Lung KR was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2006, Vol.100 (1), p.39-45
Hauptverfasser: Murali, P.M., Rajasekaran, S., Paramesh, P., Krishnarajasekar, O.R., Vasudevan, S., Nalini, K., Lakshmisubramanian, S., Deivanayagam, C.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical study was undertaken to investigate the safety and efficacy of a plant-based formulation (DCBT1234-Lung KR), which earlier through 2 trials was found to improve FEV 1 and the quality of life of COPD patients. The efficacy of DCBT1234-Lung KR was assessed using pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gas (ABG) analyses and the clinical symptoms of COPD in a 6-month study period against a matching placebo and a biomedical drug combination (salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine). One hundred and five subjects aged between 35 and 85 years with a smoking history of more than 20 pack years, showing little or no improvement in FEV 1 upon a bronchial challenge of 200 μg of inhaled salbutamol and exhibiting ABG percentage of less than 85% of oxygen saturation were taken up for the study. The study had 3 arms viz., the plant-based formulation (DCBT1234-Lung KR), placebo and salbutamol (12 mg/day) plus theophylline (300 mg/day) plus bromhexine (24 mg/day). The end point of the study was determined as an improvement of FEV 1 by 200 mL and/or increased ABG values (>90% PaO 2) and clinical symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability, and sleep disturbances. DCBT1234-Lung KR patients showed statistically significant (95% level) improvement in FEV 1 and PaO 2 in comparison with salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine and placebo patients. Twenty-three per cent of DCBT1234-Lung KR patients, 19% of salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine group and 12% of placebo group patients showed the desired 200 mL improvement in FEV 1 values in comparison with the other 2 arms. Improved PaO 2 was observed in 15.4% of the DCBT1234-Lung KR patients while no improvement was seen with patients in any other arms. Symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability and sleep disturbances also significantly reduced in DCBT1234-Lung KR and the biomedical group patients, but not in the placebo arm. DCBT1234-Lung KR was equivalent, if not better than the present day treatment with salbutamol, theophylline and bromhexine combination in COPD patients and this was ascertained using FEV 1 and ABG values.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2005.04.011