Diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

Abstract Aims The objective of this study was to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnosed with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to gene...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Primary care diabetes 2007-09, Vol.1 (3), p.129-134
Hauptverfasser: Rubino, Annalisa, Rousculp, Matthew D, Davis, Kimberly, Wang, Jianmin, Bastyr, Edward J, Tesfaye, Solomon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims The objective of this study was to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnosed with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to general practitioners and diabetes specialists. Existing physicians’ records were used to quantify the frequency of DPN diagnoses, and notes from patients’ medical charts were used to characterize symptoms. Results The average number of physicians per country was 41 (range of 34–49). The proportion of diabetes patients diagnosed with DPN ranged from 9.6% (95% CI, 7.1–12.2) in Spain to 23.1% (95% CI, 15.4–30.7) in Italy. Of 913 DPN study patients, 55.0% were male, and 78.5% had type 2 diabetes. Mean age was 64.5 ± 12.5 years. A DPN diagnosis was based primarily on symptoms. Approximately 27% of patients had no documented neurological examination. “Prickling” was the most common DPN symptom recorded in France, Italy, and Spain, and “numbness” was the most common in the UK. Conclusions Country-specific estimates of DPN diagnosis may reflect clinical management of diabetes and DPN. A substantial number of diagnoses were not associated with a record of a neurological examination.
ISSN:1751-9918
1878-0210
DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2007.07.006