Physiological responses during submaximal interval swimming training: Effects of interval duration

The aim of the present study was to determine the time sustained near ̇O 2max in two interval training (IT) swimming sessions comprising 4×400 m (IT 4×4oo) or 16x100 (IT 16×100). Elite swimmers (Mean±SD age 18±2 yrs; body mass 66.9±6.5 kg; swim ̇O 2max 55.7±5.8 ml·kg −1·min -1) completed three exper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science and medicine in sport 2005-12, Vol.8 (4), p.392-402
Hauptverfasser: Bentley, D.J., Roels, B., Hellard, P., Fauquet, C., Libicz, S., Millet, G.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the present study was to determine the time sustained near ̇O 2max in two interval training (IT) swimming sessions comprising 4×400 m (IT 4×4oo) or 16x100 (IT 16×100). Elite swimmers (Mean±SD age 18±2 yrs; body mass 66.9±6.5 kg; swim ̇O 2max 55.7±5.8 ml·kg −1·min -1) completed three experimental sessions at a 50-m indoor pool over a one week period. The first test comprised a 5 × 200-m incremental test to exhaustion for determination of the pulmonary ventilation threshold (VT, m·s −1), ̇O 2max, the velocity associated with ̇O 2max (̇O 2max, m·s −1) and maximum heart rate (HR max, b·min −1). The remaining two tests involved the IT 4×4oo and IT 16×100 performed in a randomised order. The two IT sessions where completed at a velocity representing 25% of the difference between the VT and the ̇O 2max (Δ25%) and in the same work to rest ratio. During the IT sessions ̇O 2 as well as HR were measured. The duration (s) >90% ̇O 2max, also the duration (s) >90% HR max, were not significantly different in the IT 16×100 and IT 4×4oo. However, limits of agreement (LIM AG) analysis demonstrated considerable individual variation in the time >90% ̇O 2max (mean difference ±2SD =222±819 s) and the time >90% HR max (mean difference ±2SD =61±758 s) between the two IT sessions. This factor deserves further research to establish the characteristics of those athletes which influence the physiological responses in IT of short or longer duration repetitions.
ISSN:1440-2440
1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/S1440-2440(05)80054-4