Palliative surgical bypass for pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancers
The optimal method of palliation for patients with unresectable pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer (PAC) is controversial with surgical bypass or endoscopic stenting, each having advantages and disadvantages. We analysed short term outcomes and survival for all patients undergoing surgical palliat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal cancer 2007-12, Vol.38 (2-4), p.102-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The optimal method of palliation for patients with unresectable pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer (PAC) is controversial with surgical bypass or endoscopic stenting, each having advantages and disadvantages.
We analysed short term outcomes and survival for all patients undergoing surgical palliative bypass procedures.
All patients undergoing palliative surgical bypass for unresectable PAC from Aug 1999 to July 2007 were identified from our database. Outcomes analysed were peri-operative morbidity, mortality, and overall survival with comparisons from contemporaneous literature.
One hundred eight patients (median age 65 (range 36-86) years; male = 61) had palliative surgical bypass procedures for unresectable PAC. Patients underwent combined biliary and gastric bypass (n = 81, 75%), gastric bypass alone (n = 24, 22.2%) or biliary bypass alone (n = 3, 2.8%). Overall mortality was 6.5% and the morbidity was 15.7%. Median hospital stay was 11 (range 4-54) days. Median survival was 6 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.3-7.6) months. No re-explorations for recurrent biliary or gastric obstruction were required. Contemporaneous literature review showed similar results.
Surgical bypass performed in a specialist pancreatic center can offer effective palliation for unresectable PAC, with satisfactory outcomes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-6628 1941-6636 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12029-008-9020-4 |