The rarity of clinically significant rise in intraocular pressure after laser peripheral iridotomy with apraclonidine

To determine the incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) rise of varying degrees after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in patients with and without glaucoma treated perioperatively with pilocarpine and apraclonidine. A retrospective chart review. A total of 289 eyes in 179 patients with narrow occl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 1998-12, Vol.105 (12), p.2256-2259
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, Richard, Perkins, Todd W, Gangnon, Ron, Kaufman, Paul L, Heatley, Gregg A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) rise of varying degrees after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in patients with and without glaucoma treated perioperatively with pilocarpine and apraclonidine. A retrospective chart review. A total of 289 eyes in 179 patients with narrow occludable angles (NOA) (N = 148), open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OAG) (N = 115), or chronic-angle closure glaucoma (CACG) (N = 26) were reviewed. The difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP, absolute postop- erative IOP, and the need for acute IOP-lowering treatment was noted. Only 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03%–5.8%; 1 of 94) of patients and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.02%–3.7%; 1 of 148) of eyes with NOA experienced a rise of more than 10 mmHg 1 to 2 hours after LPI. The incidence of postoperative IOP greater than 25 mmHg and acute postoperative IOP-lowering management was 0% (95% CI, 0%–3.8%). Intraocular pressure in 1 of 115 eyes (0.9%, 95% CI, 0.02%–4.7%) with OAG rose more than 10 mmHg, requiring acute treatment. None of the 26 CACG eyes experienced a rise of more than 10 mmHg (95% CI, 0%–13.2%). The IOP rise that requires further intervention after LPI with the perioperative use of pilocarpine and apraclonidine is very uncommon. In patients with NOA, routine postiridotomy IOP monitoring may not be required.
ISSN:0161-6420
1549-4713
DOI:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91225-8