T2-weighted breath-hold MRI of the liver at 1.0 T: Comparison of turbo spin-echo and HASTE sequences with and without fat suppression

To compare the clinical usefulness of T2‐weighted breath‐hold sequences for imaging the liver, 33 patients with 97 focal hepatic lesions were studied with a 1.0‐T scanner by using T2‐weighted breath‐hold turbo spin‐echo (SE) sequences and T2‐weighted breath‐hold half‐Fourier single‐shot turbo SE (HA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 1998-11, Vol.8 (6), p.1213-1218
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tae Kyoung, Lee, Hyun Joo, Jang, Hyun-Jung, Kim, Ah Young, Han, Joon Koo, Choi, Byung Ihn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the clinical usefulness of T2‐weighted breath‐hold sequences for imaging the liver, 33 patients with 97 focal hepatic lesions were studied with a 1.0‐T scanner by using T2‐weighted breath‐hold turbo spin‐echo (SE) sequences and T2‐weighted breath‐hold half‐Fourier single‐shot turbo SE (HASTE) sequences with and without fat suppression. Images were quantitatively analyzed for liver signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and lesion‐to‐liver contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed for lesion conspicuity, motion artifacts, and anatomic sharpness of extrahepatic structures. Breath‐hold turbo SE imaging with fat suppression showed the highest CNR for cystic lesions and the best lesion conspicuity for cystic and solid lesions among the four sequences. For solid lesions, there was no significant difference of lesion‐to‐liver CNR between them. HASTE sequence was superior to turbo SE sequences in terms of motion artifacts; however, the usefulness for evaluating focal hepatic lesions was limited compared with turbo SE sequence with fat suppression. Addition of fat suppression was not helpful for HASTE imaging because of decreased lesion conspicuity and extrahepatic details without the advantage of reducing motion artifacts. This study suggests that turbo SE sequence with fat suppression is most useful for breath‐hold T2‐weighted liver imaging at 1.0 T. Addition of imaging without fat suppression can be considered for evaluating extrahepatic structures. HASTE sequence may have a role for imaging uncooperative patients due to absence of motion artifacts.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.1880080606