Left-Sided Suprarenal Retrocrural Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Cervical Cancer by Laparoscopy

Objective.Conventional open suprarenal retrocrural lymphadenectomy is done via a thoraco–abdominal approach including partial rib resection. We developed a less invasive technique. Methods.Through a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach the left paracolic peritoneum and the left phrenicocolic ligame...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1998-11, Vol.71 (2), p.219-222
Hauptverfasser: Possover, Marc, Krause, Norman, Drahonovsky, Jan, Schneider, Achim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective.Conventional open suprarenal retrocrural lymphadenectomy is done via a thoraco–abdominal approach including partial rib resection. We developed a less invasive technique. Methods.Through a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach the left paracolic peritoneum and the left phrenicocolic ligament are transected. The colonic flexure, left kidney with adrenal, tail of the pancreas, and spleen are mobilized and retracted medially. The suprarenal aorta with superior mesenteric artery and coeliac trunk are exposed. The crus of the diaphragm and the right inferior phrenic artery are transected. This allows lymphadenectomy from the level of the left renal vessels to the crus of the diaphragm. Results.In October 1997 three women with cervical cancer stage IIIB underwent laparoscopic suprarenal retrocrural lymphadenectomy. A mean of 10 lymph nodes was removed (range 8–12). Duration of operation was on average 218 min (range 196–258 min). Intraoperative blood loss was estimated between 100 and 400 ml and hospital stay was 4 days on average. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. Conclusion.This laparoscopic technique may prove useful for staging and treatment of women with advanced gynecologic cancer.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1006/gyno.1998.5172