Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients
Objective: Following out-of-hospital defibrillation attempts, electrocardiographic instability challenges accurate assessment of defibrillation efficacy and post-shock rhythm. Presently, there is no precise definition of defibrillation efficacy in the out-of-hospital setting that is consistently use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 1999-07, Vol.41 (2), p.133-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Following out-of-hospital defibrillation attempts, electrocardiographic instability challenges accurate assessment of defibrillation efficacy and post-shock rhythm. Presently, there is no precise definition of defibrillation efficacy in the out-of-hospital setting that is consistently used. The objective of this study was to characterize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythms following low-energy biphasic and high-energy monophasic shocks in order to precisely define defibrillation efficacy and establish uniform criteria for the evaluation of shock performance.
Methods: Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) delivering 150 J impedance-compensating biphasic or 200–360 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks were observed in a combined police and paramedic program. ECGs from 29 biphasic patients and 87 monophasic patients were classified as organized, asystole or VF at post-shock times of 3, 5, 10, 20 and 60 s.
Results: Post-shock time (
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00040-4 |