Oral clonidine premedication reduces induction dose and prolongs awakening time from propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia

To evaluate whether oral clonidine premedication affects the induction dose of propofol and awakening time from epidural and propofol anesthesia. Thirty-nine female patients (ASA I or II) were randomly allocated to receive 5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine p.o. or no clonidine 90 min before induction of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of anesthesia 1999-09, Vol.46 (9), p.894-896
Hauptverfasser: GOYAGI, T, TANAKA, M, NISHIKAWA, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate whether oral clonidine premedication affects the induction dose of propofol and awakening time from epidural and propofol anesthesia. Thirty-nine female patients (ASA I or II) were randomly allocated to receive 5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine p.o. or no clonidine 90 min before induction of anesthesia. After epidural anesthesia was achieved with lidocaine, general anesthesia was induced with continuous i.v. infusion of propofol at a rate of 50 mg x min(-1) until loss of eyelash reflex and responses to verbal commands, which were judged by a blinded observer. After a laryngeal mask airway was inserted, anesthesia was maintained with N2O 67%, O2 33% and propofol adjusted to maintain hemodynamic stability. After completion of surgery, a blinded observer recorded the time from discontinuance of propofol and N2O until the patient was awake and responsive (awakening time), and then, the laryngeal mask airway was removed. The induction dose of propofol in the clonidine group (1.4 +/- 0.3 mg) was less than that in the control group (1.9 +/- 0.4 mg, P < 0.05), while the awakening time of the clonidine group (470 +/- 145 sec) was longer than that of the control group (329 +/- 123 sec, P < 0.05). Premedication with 5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine p.o. reduced the induction dose of propofol, but delayed emergence from propofol anesthesia.
ISSN:0832-610X
1496-8975
DOI:10.1007/BF03012982