The effect of intraarticular anesthesia and elastic bandage on elbow proprioception

Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 1998-09, Vol.7 (5), p.501-504
Hauptverfasser: Khabie, Victor, Schwartz, Michael C, Rokito, Andrew S, Gallagher, Maureen A, Cuomo, Frances, Zuckerman, Joseph D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Twenty uninjured male volunteers were studied to characterize normal elbow proprioception and to investigate the effect of applying an elastic bandage to the extremity and injection of an intraarticular anesthetic. A modified Biodex dynamometer was used to study position sense and detection of motion. In part 1 of the study position sense was tested by flexing the elbow to a predetermined angle, returing to the starting position, and then asking the subject to identify that angle. In part 2 detection of motion was tested by asking the subject to disengage the apparatus by pressing a stop button when movement was detected. The testing conditions in part 1 and part 2 were repeated after the elbow was wrapped with an elastic bandage and again after an intraarticular injection of 3 cc 1% lidocaine with the bandage removed. Ten additional subjects underwent testing of both elbows to examine the effect of arm dominance. Mean position sense was within 3.3° ± 1.3° of the actual angle in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic. A significant improvement in position sense was observed (2.2° ± 1.2°) after an elastic bandage was applied (P < .004). No significant difference was seen in position sense after lidocaine was injected. The mean threshold for detection of motion in trials without an elastic bandage or an anesthetic was 4.21° ± 1.56°. No significant differences were seen in detection of motion observed with the elastic bandage or intraarticular anesthetic. No significant differences were seen between dominant and nondominant extremities for both position sense and detection of motion. The application of an elastic bandage improved position sense, suggesting that tactile cue from cutaneous or other extraarticular receptors may play a role in elbow proprioception. Intraarticular anesthesia, however, had little effect, suggesting that intracapsular receptors play a lesser role in elbow proprioception. The determination of proprioceptive qualities for the normal elbow can aid in the understanding of elbow function and provide a basis for defining its role in elbow dysfunction.
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90202-6