Comparison of External Load Compensation During Rhythmic Arm Movements and Rhythmic Jaw Movements in Humans
1 Department of Oral Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Utrecht; and 2 Helmholtz Institute, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utrecht, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands Abbink, J. H., A. van der Bilt, F. Bosman, H. W. van der Glas, C. J. Erkelens, and M.F.H. Klaasse...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1999-09, Vol.82 (3), p.1209-1217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Department of Oral Pathophysiology, Faculty
of Medicine, University of Utrecht; and
2 Helmholtz Institute, Faculty of Physics and
Astronomy, University of Utrecht, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Abbink, J. H.,
A. van der
Bilt,
F. Bosman,
H. W. van der Glas,
C. J. Erkelens, and
M.F.H. Klaassen.
Comparison of External Load Compensation During Rhythmic Arm
Movements and Rhythmic Jaw Movements in Humans. J. Neurophysiol. 82: 1209-1217, 1999. Experiments were
performed on human elbow flexor and extensor muscles and jaw-opening
and -closing muscles to observe the effect on rhythmic movements of
sudden loading. The load was provided by an electromagnetic device,
which simulated the appearance of a smoothly increasing spring-like
load. The responses to this loading were compared in jaw and elbow
movements and between expected and unexpected disturbances. All muscles
showed electromyographic responses to unexpected perturbations, with
latencies of ~65 ms in the arm muscles and 25 ms in the jaw. When
loading was predictable, anticipatory responses started in arm muscles
~200 ms before and in jaw muscles 100 ms before the onset of loading.
The reflex responses relative to the anticipatory responses were
smaller for the arm muscles than for the jaw muscles. The reflex
responses in the arm muscles were the same with unexpected and expected perturbations, whereas anticipation increased the reflex responses in
the jaw muscles. Biceps brachii and triceps brachii showed similar
sensory-induced responses and similar anticipatory responses. Jaw
muscles differed, however, in that the reflex response was stronger in
masseter than in digastric. It was concluded that reflex responses in
the arm muscles cannot overcome the loading of the arm adequately,
which is compensated by a large centrally programmed response when
loading is predictable. The jaw muscles, particularly the jaw-closing
muscles, tend to respond mainly through reflex loops, even when loading
of the jaw is anticipated. The differences between the responses of the
arm and the jaw muscles may be related to physical differences. For
example, the jaw was decelerated more strongly by the load than the
heavier arm. The jaw was decelerated strongly but briefly, |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1209 |