Alveolar ridge reconstruction and/or preservation using root form bioglass cones

. Extraction of a tooth necessitated by factors such as developmental problems, trauma, severe periodontal disease and endodontic problems often causes deformities of the residual alveolar ridge in the maxillary anterior region. These cases are usually difficult to restore prosthetically and they re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 1998-10, Vol.25 (10), p.832-839
Hauptverfasser: Yilmaz, Selçuk, Efeoǧlu, Elvan, Kiliç, Ali Riza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:. Extraction of a tooth necessitated by factors such as developmental problems, trauma, severe periodontal disease and endodontic problems often causes deformities of the residual alveolar ridge in the maxillary anterior region. These cases are usually difficult to restore prosthetically and they result in poor esthetics and insufficient occlusal function. This study investigated the efficacy of root form bioactive glass cones implanted into (a) artificial sockets produced by bone splitting of previous extraction sites (group BS) and (b) fresh extraction sockets (group FES), We included conventional extraction sockets sutured without implanting the root form bioactive glass cones as a control (group C). A total of 16 patients were treated for whom extractions had been indicated due to severe periodontitis, 6 patients with 7 implant sites having Class II or III alveolar ridge deformities comprised the BS group. 5 patients with 10 implant sites comprised the FES group. Group C, comprised 5 patients with 10 extraction sites. Alveolar ridge width and height measurements were obtained using study casts preoperatively, immediately postoperatively. and at 3 and 12 months after operation. In the BS group, while the width of the alveolar ridge increased by 2.8 ± 1.18mm immediately after ridge augmentation procedure and by 2.4±0.93 mm at 1 year after operation (p
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02378.x