Intraclass Correlation for Measures from a Worksite Health Promotion Study: Estimates, Correlates, and Applications

Objectives. Investigators planning studies employing group-randomized designs need good estimates of the extra variation introduced as a result of correlated observations within units of assignment. We report intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for a wide range of outcomes commonly employed i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of health promotion 1999-07, Vol.13 (6), p.347-357
Hauptverfasser: Martinson, Brian C., Murray, David M., Jeffery, Robert W., Hennrikus, Deborah J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. Investigators planning studies employing group-randomized designs need good estimates of the extra variation introduced as a result of correlated observations within units of assignment. We report intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for a wide range of outcomes commonly employed in worksite studies and demonstrate analysis methods that can limit their deleterious impact. Methods. A sample of 11, 711 employees of 24 firms recruited from the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area completed a mailed survey in the SUCCESS study, reporting on a broad array of outcomes. Applying mixed-model regression, we provide both crude and adjusted estimates of ICCs for 27 outcomes. Results. The crude ICCs were generally small, with a mean of .0163 and values ranging from 0 to .0650. Adjustment for demographics reduced the ICCs for 25 of the 27 outcomes, and adjustment for additional individual-level covariates further reduced the ICCs for 23 of the 27 outcomes. Conclusions. Our results suggest that worksite-level ICCs for a variety of outcomes are generally small and can generally be reduced by adjustment for individual-level characteristics. Incorporating this information in planning worksite studies can improve sample size calculations to avoid underpowered studies.
ISSN:0890-1171
2168-6602
DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-13.6.347