Localization of Insulinomas

HYPOTHESIS Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperative and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism who were referre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 1999-08, Vol.134 (8), p.818-823
Hauptverfasser: Boukhman, Milana P, Karam, John M, Shaver, John, Siperstein, Allan E, DeLorimier, Alfred A, Clark, Orlo H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:HYPOTHESIS Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperative and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism who were referred to University of California, San Francisco, from 1975 to 1998. METHODS Sensitivities of the localization techniques for insulinoma were evaluated. RESULTS The sensitivities of tumor localization with arteriography, computed tomography, preoperative ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium, transhepatic venous sampling, palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography were 47%, 24%, 50%, 30%, 40%, 55%, 76%, and 91%, respectively. Nine of the 11 nonpalpable and nonvisible tumors at operation were localized by intraoperative ultrasonography. CONCLUSION The currently available preoperative localization tests are not reliable enough to be recommended when intraoperative ultrasonography is available.Arch Surg. 1999;134:818-823-->
ISSN:0004-0010
2168-6254
1538-3644
2168-6262
DOI:10.1001/archsurg.134.8.818