Localization of Insulinomas
HYPOTHESIS Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperative and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism who were referre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 1999-08, Vol.134 (8), p.818-823 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | HYPOTHESIS Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperative and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism who were referred to University of California, San Francisco, from 1975 to 1998. METHODS Sensitivities of the localization techniques for insulinoma were evaluated. RESULTS The sensitivities of tumor localization with arteriography, computed tomography, preoperative ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium, transhepatic venous sampling, palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography were 47%, 24%, 50%, 30%, 40%, 55%, 76%, and 91%, respectively. Nine of the 11 nonpalpable and nonvisible tumors at operation were localized by intraoperative ultrasonography. CONCLUSION The currently available preoperative localization tests are not reliable enough to be recommended when intraoperative ultrasonography is available.Arch Surg. 1999;134:818-823--> |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-0010 2168-6254 1538-3644 2168-6262 |
DOI: | 10.1001/archsurg.134.8.818 |