Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pharmaceutical development and technology 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 431 |
container_title | Pharmaceutical development and technology |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Habib, Yacoub S. Abramowitz, Robert Jerzewski, Robert L. Jain, Nemichand B. Agharkar, Shreeram N. |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1081/PDT-100101379 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69931835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69931835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1PGzEQxS3Uiq9y5FrtoeK27TiOv05VGwpFAoFUKo6W4x03Rs4utb1C-e_rKCktByROHs_83ujpDSHHFD5SUPTTzeltSwEoUCb1DtmnoGWrlZBv1rVirZxy2CMHOd9XSmngu2SPwpRNJ0rvk8eL3PwIMbjgA3bNHZb2PNl-jLbU71VwaXBplYuNMfTYzDDGMQ4Zm69YCqamLGzfXKfwK_Q2vl7--R15623MeLR9D8nPs2-3s-_t5fX5xezLZeuYFqXFuedCOtR84nSnUVrwfsJFbYDic5CUrcdOQCe6ieC-c5UHrTRnc6CCHZKTzd6HNPweMRezDNlVG7bHYcxGaM2oYryC7QaslnNO6M1DCkubVoaCWSdtatLmKenKv98uHudL7P6jN9FW4MMWsNnZ6GssLuR_XD2FllAxtcFC74e0tI9Dip0pdhWH9FfDXrIgn0kXaGNZOJvQ3A9jqgfJL5j_A9AarAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69931835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-9867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1081/PDT-100101379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10434289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cellulose - chemistry ; Compactibility ; Compressibility ; Crystallization ; Drug Compounding ; General pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Microcrystalline cellulose ; Particle Size ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Porosity ; Powders ; Silicified microcrystalline cellulose ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry ; Strain rate sensitivity ; Water ; Wet granulation</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical development and technology, 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437</ispartof><rights>1999 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/PDT-100101379$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/PDT-100101379$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,59753,60436,60542,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1890970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10434289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramowitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Nemichand B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><title>Pharmaceutical development and technology</title><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cellulose - chemistry</subject><subject>Compactibility</subject><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Drug Compounding</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microcrystalline cellulose</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Silicified microcrystalline cellulose</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Strain rate sensitivity</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Wet granulation</subject><issn>1083-7450</issn><issn>1097-9867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1PGzEQxS3Uiq9y5FrtoeK27TiOv05VGwpFAoFUKo6W4x03Rs4utb1C-e_rKCktByROHs_83ujpDSHHFD5SUPTTzeltSwEoUCb1DtmnoGWrlZBv1rVirZxy2CMHOd9XSmngu2SPwpRNJ0rvk8eL3PwIMbjgA3bNHZb2PNl-jLbU71VwaXBplYuNMfTYzDDGMQ4Zm69YCqamLGzfXKfwK_Q2vl7--R15623MeLR9D8nPs2-3s-_t5fX5xezLZeuYFqXFuedCOtR84nSnUVrwfsJFbYDic5CUrcdOQCe6ieC-c5UHrTRnc6CCHZKTzd6HNPweMRezDNlVG7bHYcxGaM2oYryC7QaslnNO6M1DCkubVoaCWSdtatLmKenKv98uHudL7P6jN9FW4MMWsNnZ6GssLuR_XD2FllAxtcFC74e0tI9Dip0pdhWH9FfDXrIgn0kXaGNZOJvQ3A9jqgfJL5j_A9AarAM</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Habib, Yacoub S.</creator><creator>Abramowitz, Robert</creator><creator>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creator><creator>Jain, Nemichand B.</creator><creator>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><author>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cellulose - chemistry</topic><topic>Compactibility</topic><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Drug Compounding</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microcrystalline cellulose</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Silicified microcrystalline cellulose</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Strain rate sensitivity</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Wet granulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramowitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Nemichand B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habib, Yacoub S.</au><au>Abramowitz, Robert</au><au>Jerzewski, Robert L.</au><au>Jain, Nemichand B.</au><au>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>431-437</pages><issn>1083-7450</issn><eissn>1097-9867</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>10434289</pmid><doi>10.1081/PDT-100101379</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1083-7450 |
ispartof | Pharmaceutical development and technology, 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437 |
issn | 1083-7450 1097-9867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69931835 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
subjects | Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Cellulose - chemistry Compactibility Compressibility Crystallization Drug Compounding General pharmacology Medical sciences Microcrystalline cellulose Particle Size Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry Pharmacology. Drug treatments Porosity Powders Silicified microcrystalline cellulose Silicon Dioxide - chemistry Strain rate sensitivity Water Wet granulation |
title | Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Silicified%20Wet-Granulated%20Microcrystalline%20Cellulose%20Better%20than%20Original%20Wet-Granulated%20Microcrystalline%20Cellulose?&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20development%20and%20technology&rft.au=Habib,%20Yacoub%20S.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=431-437&rft.issn=1083-7450&rft.eissn=1097-9867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1081/PDT-100101379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E69931835%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69931835&rft_id=info:pmid/10434289&rfr_iscdi=true |