Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmaceutical development and technology 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437
Hauptverfasser: Habib, Yacoub S., Abramowitz, Robert, Jerzewski, Robert L., Jain, Nemichand B., Agharkar, Shreeram N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 437
container_issue 3
container_start_page 431
container_title Pharmaceutical development and technology
container_volume 4
creator Habib, Yacoub S.
Abramowitz, Robert
Jerzewski, Robert L.
Jain, Nemichand B.
Agharkar, Shreeram N.
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1081/PDT-100101379
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69931835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69931835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1PGzEQxS3Uiq9y5FrtoeK27TiOv05VGwpFAoFUKo6W4x03Rs4utb1C-e_rKCktByROHs_83ujpDSHHFD5SUPTTzeltSwEoUCb1DtmnoGWrlZBv1rVirZxy2CMHOd9XSmngu2SPwpRNJ0rvk8eL3PwIMbjgA3bNHZb2PNl-jLbU71VwaXBplYuNMfTYzDDGMQ4Zm69YCqamLGzfXKfwK_Q2vl7--R15623MeLR9D8nPs2-3s-_t5fX5xezLZeuYFqXFuedCOtR84nSnUVrwfsJFbYDic5CUrcdOQCe6ieC-c5UHrTRnc6CCHZKTzd6HNPweMRezDNlVG7bHYcxGaM2oYryC7QaslnNO6M1DCkubVoaCWSdtatLmKenKv98uHudL7P6jN9FW4MMWsNnZ6GssLuR_XD2FllAxtcFC74e0tI9Dip0pdhWH9FfDXrIgn0kXaGNZOJvQ3A9jqgfJL5j_A9AarAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69931835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-9867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1081/PDT-100101379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10434289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cellulose - chemistry ; Compactibility ; Compressibility ; Crystallization ; Drug Compounding ; General pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Microcrystalline cellulose ; Particle Size ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Porosity ; Powders ; Silicified microcrystalline cellulose ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry ; Strain rate sensitivity ; Water ; Wet granulation</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical development and technology, 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437</ispartof><rights>1999 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/PDT-100101379$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/PDT-100101379$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,59753,60436,60542,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1890970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10434289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramowitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Nemichand B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><title>Pharmaceutical development and technology</title><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cellulose - chemistry</subject><subject>Compactibility</subject><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Drug Compounding</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microcrystalline cellulose</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powders</subject><subject>Silicified microcrystalline cellulose</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Strain rate sensitivity</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Wet granulation</subject><issn>1083-7450</issn><issn>1097-9867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1PGzEQxS3Uiq9y5FrtoeK27TiOv05VGwpFAoFUKo6W4x03Rs4utb1C-e_rKCktByROHs_83ujpDSHHFD5SUPTTzeltSwEoUCb1DtmnoGWrlZBv1rVirZxy2CMHOd9XSmngu2SPwpRNJ0rvk8eL3PwIMbjgA3bNHZb2PNl-jLbU71VwaXBplYuNMfTYzDDGMQ4Zm69YCqamLGzfXKfwK_Q2vl7--R15623MeLR9D8nPs2-3s-_t5fX5xezLZeuYFqXFuedCOtR84nSnUVrwfsJFbYDic5CUrcdOQCe6ieC-c5UHrTRnc6CCHZKTzd6HNPweMRezDNlVG7bHYcxGaM2oYryC7QaslnNO6M1DCkubVoaCWSdtatLmKenKv98uHudL7P6jN9FW4MMWsNnZ6GssLuR_XD2FllAxtcFC74e0tI9Dip0pdhWH9FfDXrIgn0kXaGNZOJvQ3A9jqgfJL5j_A9AarAM</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Habib, Yacoub S.</creator><creator>Abramowitz, Robert</creator><creator>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creator><creator>Jain, Nemichand B.</creator><creator>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</title><author>Habib, Yacoub S. ; Abramowitz, Robert ; Jerzewski, Robert L. ; Jain, Nemichand B. ; Agharkar, Shreeram N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ebf567ce952c9d9e7a0ff256e95085b071367cec60d6d265fdc567098953b0163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cellulose - chemistry</topic><topic>Compactibility</topic><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Drug Compounding</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microcrystalline cellulose</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powders</topic><topic>Silicified microcrystalline cellulose</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Strain rate sensitivity</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Wet granulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habib, Yacoub S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abramowitz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerzewski, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Nemichand B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habib, Yacoub S.</au><au>Abramowitz, Robert</au><au>Jerzewski, Robert L.</au><au>Jain, Nemichand B.</au><au>Agharkar, Shreeram N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>431-437</pages><issn>1083-7450</issn><eissn>1097-9867</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of granulating water level on the physical-mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and silicified microcrystalline cellulose (SMCC). Granulations containing either MCC or SMCC were manufactured at different water levels using a high-shear mixer and were then tray-dried. The water level ranged from 0 to 100%. The granules were evaluated for size, granular and true density, porosity, flow, compactibility, compressibility, and strain-rate sensitivity index (SRS). Increasing the water level affected the size, increased the granular density and flow properties of the granules, and decreased the porosity and compactibility. The compactibilities for both materials were similar and acceptable at each granulating water level up to 40%. They both showed poor compactibility at higher water levels. Yield values and SRSs revealed that MCC and SMCC have similar compressibility, and that both exhibit a plastic component to the deformation process. The granulating water level had no statistically significant effect on the compressibility or the SRS for MCC or SMCC. SMCC did not offer practical advantages over MCC, other than better flow in the powder form, which could be attributed to slightly larger particle size and the presence of silicon dioxide in its structure.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>10434289</pmid><doi>10.1081/PDT-100101379</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-7450
ispartof Pharmaceutical development and technology, 1999, Vol.4 (3), p.431-437
issn 1083-7450
1097-9867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69931835
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN
subjects Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Cellulose - chemistry
Compactibility
Compressibility
Crystallization
Drug Compounding
General pharmacology
Medical sciences
Microcrystalline cellulose
Particle Size
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Porosity
Powders
Silicified microcrystalline cellulose
Silicon Dioxide - chemistry
Strain rate sensitivity
Water
Wet granulation
title Is Silicified Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose Better than Original Wet-Granulated Microcrystalline Cellulose?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Silicified%20Wet-Granulated%20Microcrystalline%20Cellulose%20Better%20than%20Original%20Wet-Granulated%20Microcrystalline%20Cellulose?&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20development%20and%20technology&rft.au=Habib,%20Yacoub%20S.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=431-437&rft.issn=1083-7450&rft.eissn=1097-9867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1081/PDT-100101379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E69931835%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69931835&rft_id=info:pmid/10434289&rfr_iscdi=true