Patterns and Characteristics of Repeat Mammography among Women 50 Years and Older
Whereas efforts encouraging women to obtain initial mammograms are laudable, the importance of returning for subsequent routine mammograms cannot be minimized. The purpose of this study was to measure the timing, patterns, and characteristics of repeat screening mammography over time in a defined po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 1999-07, Vol.8 (7), p.595-599 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Whereas efforts encouraging women to obtain initial mammograms are laudable, the importance of returning for subsequent routine
mammograms cannot be minimized. The purpose of this study was to measure the timing, patterns, and characteristics of repeat
screening mammography over time in a defined population of health maintenance organization members for whom mammography was
a fully covered benefit. We identified all women ages 50–74 years who were enrolled in a southeastern Michigan health maintenance
organization, assigned to a large medical group, and received at least one screening mammogram with a normal result between
January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1996. Using administrative and radiology data, we calculated the proportion of women who
received a subsequent mammogram within 2 years and the time to subsequent screening, both overall and stratified by demographic
characteristics. We also examined screening patterns over a 5-year period. Of the 8749 women included in this study, 66.0%
[95% confidence interval (CI), 65.0–67.0%] were subsequently screened within 2 years. We found slightly higher rates among
Caucasians and married women. The proportion of women who received repeat mammography increased with estimated household income
[9.5% difference between the highest and lowest categories (95% CI, 6.5–12.5%)]. The median time to subsequent screening was
17.7 months, and the probability of repeat screening was higher for women whose initial mammogram was between January 1992
and December 1994 compared to those receiving an initial mammogram between January 1989 and December 1991 (9.6% difference;
95% CI, 7.5–11.7%). Repeat mammography has improved over time; however, socioeconomic status could contribute to longer-than-intended
intervals between screening when translated into real-world clinical practice. In a setting where most physicians recommended
annual screening, we found that the median time to subsequent screening was delayed by 6 months. If annual mammography is
the goal, recommendations should be made with the understanding of how the timing of repeat screening occurs in clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |