Comparative antimicrobial activity of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse in vitro

. Although laboratory studies are not necessarily predictive of clinical activity, they can help to elucidate mechanisms underlying clinical activity when the latter has been established. In a recent clinical study, an essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine® Antiseptic) was shown to be significantly mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 1999-07, Vol.26 (7), p.474-476
Hauptverfasser: Pan, P. H., Finnegan, M. B., Sturdivant, L., Barnett, M. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:. Although laboratory studies are not necessarily predictive of clinical activity, they can help to elucidate mechanisms underlying clinical activity when the latter has been established. In a recent clinical study, an essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine® Antiseptic) was shown to be significantly more effective than an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse (Meridol®) in inhibiting supragingival plaque formation. This paper reports the results of laboratory studies comparing the antimicrobial effectiveness of these 2 mouthrinses using a kill kinetics assay and a plaque biofilm kill assay. In both assays, the essential oil mouthrinse was considerably more effective than the amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse. These findings are consistent with the results of the clinical trial and may help to explain the observed differences in clinical activity.
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260710.x