Comparative antimicrobial activity of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse in vitro
. Although laboratory studies are not necessarily predictive of clinical activity, they can help to elucidate mechanisms underlying clinical activity when the latter has been established. In a recent clinical study, an essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine® Antiseptic) was shown to be significantly mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical periodontology 1999-07, Vol.26 (7), p.474-476 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | . Although laboratory studies are not necessarily predictive of clinical activity, they can help to elucidate mechanisms underlying clinical activity when the latter has been established. In a recent clinical study, an essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine® Antiseptic) was shown to be significantly more effective than an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse (Meridol®) in inhibiting supragingival plaque formation. This paper reports the results of laboratory studies comparing the antimicrobial effectiveness of these 2 mouthrinses using a kill kinetics assay and a plaque biofilm kill assay. In both assays, the essential oil mouthrinse was considerably more effective than the amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse. These findings are consistent with the results of the clinical trial and may help to explain the observed differences in clinical activity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260710.x |