Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life, and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness, absenteeis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1999-07, Vol.282 (2), p.137-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
container_volume | 282 |
creator | Nichol, Kristin L Mendelman, Paul M Mallon, Kenneth P Jackson, Lisa A Gorse, Geoffrey J Belshe, Robert B Glezen, W. Paul Wittes, Janet |
description | CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life,
and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered
trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness,
absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September
1997 through March 1998. SETTING Thirteen centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years recruited
through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general population.
INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally administered
trivalent LAIV vaccine (n=3041) or placebo (n=1520) in the fall of 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness, febrile upper respiratory
tract illness, work loss, and health care use during the peak and total influenza
outbreak periods, and adverse events. RESULTS Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more febrile
illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2% for vaccine
vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination
significantly reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction;
95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract
illnesses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to
fewer days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses; 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of work
lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for febrile
upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care provider
visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduction for
febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription antibiotics
and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illness syndromes.
Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose or sore throat
during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adverse events between
the groups were not significantly different. The match between the type A(H3N2)
vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2])
for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggesting that LAIV provided substantial
cross-protection against this variant influenza A virus strain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.282.2.137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69892357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>302147</ama_id><sourcerecordid>69892357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-b130b3d5266db44f18d3888d67c93e7ebe1baa81141dd51dfedeebbcb465a9783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFrFDEUBvAgit1Wr4IXCVI8dda8JDOT8bYs1RYWBKn1OLxM3mjWTKZOZoT24N9upKuCF3PJB_nxSL4w9gzEGoSA13sccC2NXMs1qPoBW0GpTKHKxjxkKyEaU9Ta6CN2nNJe5JXRY3YEQgNAo1fsx3nfUzf77xQpJT72fJfzGd_MM8UFZ3L8Ms4TRkwYcuzDQvEO-bWflsSvset8JO4jvyAM85fbM_5pnL76-Jlv3BLm9IZv-AeMbhz8XZ61HfOwMYQcryaP4Ql71GNI9PSwn7CPb8-vthfF7v27y-1mV6ACORcWlLDKlbKqnNW6B-OUMcZVddcoqskSWEQDoMG5ElxPjsjazuqqxKY26oS9up97M43fFkpzO_jUUQgYaVxSWzWmkaqs_wuhlkblvjN8-Q_cj8sU8yNaCbnlWmiV0YsDWuxArr2Z_IDTbfu7_wxODwBTh6HPRXc-_XWmAaV-3er5Pcu__edQCQm6Vj8B5CSc9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211377043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Nichol, Kristin L ; Mendelman, Paul M ; Mallon, Kenneth P ; Jackson, Lisa A ; Gorse, Geoffrey J ; Belshe, Robert B ; Glezen, W. Paul ; Wittes, Janet</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichol, Kristin L ; Mendelman, Paul M ; Mallon, Kenneth P ; Jackson, Lisa A ; Gorse, Geoffrey J ; Belshe, Robert B ; Glezen, W. Paul ; Wittes, Janet</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life,
and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered
trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness,
absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September
1997 through March 1998. SETTING Thirteen centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years recruited
through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general population.
INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally administered
trivalent LAIV vaccine (n=3041) or placebo (n=1520) in the fall of 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness, febrile upper respiratory
tract illness, work loss, and health care use during the peak and total influenza
outbreak periods, and adverse events. RESULTS Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more febrile
illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2% for vaccine
vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination
significantly reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction;
95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract
illnesses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to
fewer days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses; 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of work
lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for febrile
upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care provider
visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduction for
febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription antibiotics
and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illness syndromes.
Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose or sore throat
during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adverse events between
the groups were not significantly different. The match between the type A(H3N2)
vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2])
for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggesting that LAIV provided substantial
cross-protection against this variant influenza A virus strain. CONCLUSION Intranasal trivalent LAIV vaccine was safe and effective in healthy,
working adults in a year in which a drifted influenza A virus predominated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.2.137</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10411194</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Administration, Intranasal ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cost of Illness ; Disease Outbreaks ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Influenza ; Influenza A virus ; Influenza A virus - immunology ; Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects ; Influenza Vaccines - immunology ; Influenza, Human - epidemiology ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Poisson Distribution ; Seasons ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, Attenuated - administration & dosage ; Vaccines, Attenuated - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 1999-07, Vol.282 (2), p.137-144</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jul 14, 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.282.2.137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.282.2.137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1891337$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10411194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichol, Kristin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelman, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallon, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorse, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belshe, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glezen, W. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittes, Janet</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life,
and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered
trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness,
absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September
1997 through March 1998. SETTING Thirteen centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years recruited
through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general population.
INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally administered
trivalent LAIV vaccine (n=3041) or placebo (n=1520) in the fall of 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness, febrile upper respiratory
tract illness, work loss, and health care use during the peak and total influenza
outbreak periods, and adverse events. RESULTS Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more febrile
illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2% for vaccine
vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination
significantly reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction;
95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract
illnesses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to
fewer days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses; 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of work
lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for febrile
upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care provider
visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduction for
febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription antibiotics
and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illness syndromes.
Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose or sore throat
during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adverse events between
the groups were not significantly different. The match between the type A(H3N2)
vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2])
for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggesting that LAIV provided substantial
cross-protection against this variant influenza A virus strain. CONCLUSION Intranasal trivalent LAIV vaccine was safe and effective in healthy,
working adults in a year in which a drifted influenza A virus predominated.</description><subject>Administration, Intranasal</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza A virus</subject><subject>Influenza A virus - immunology</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Poisson Distribution</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cFrFDEUBvAgit1Wr4IXCVI8dda8JDOT8bYs1RYWBKn1OLxM3mjWTKZOZoT24N9upKuCF3PJB_nxSL4w9gzEGoSA13sccC2NXMs1qPoBW0GpTKHKxjxkKyEaU9Ta6CN2nNJe5JXRY3YEQgNAo1fsx3nfUzf77xQpJT72fJfzGd_MM8UFZ3L8Ms4TRkwYcuzDQvEO-bWflsSvset8JO4jvyAM85fbM_5pnL76-Jlv3BLm9IZv-AeMbhz8XZ61HfOwMYQcryaP4Ql71GNI9PSwn7CPb8-vthfF7v27y-1mV6ACORcWlLDKlbKqnNW6B-OUMcZVddcoqskSWEQDoMG5ElxPjsjazuqqxKY26oS9up97M43fFkpzO_jUUQgYaVxSWzWmkaqs_wuhlkblvjN8-Q_cj8sU8yNaCbnlWmiV0YsDWuxArr2Z_IDTbfu7_wxODwBTh6HPRXc-_XWmAaV-3er5Pcu__edQCQm6Vj8B5CSc9w</recordid><startdate>19990714</startdate><enddate>19990714</enddate><creator>Nichol, Kristin L</creator><creator>Mendelman, Paul M</creator><creator>Mallon, Kenneth P</creator><creator>Jackson, Lisa A</creator><creator>Gorse, Geoffrey J</creator><creator>Belshe, Robert B</creator><creator>Glezen, W. Paul</creator><creator>Wittes, Janet</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990714</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Nichol, Kristin L ; Mendelman, Paul M ; Mallon, Kenneth P ; Jackson, Lisa A ; Gorse, Geoffrey J ; Belshe, Robert B ; Glezen, W. Paul ; Wittes, Janet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a312t-b130b3d5266db44f18d3888d67c93e7ebe1baa81141dd51dfedeebbcb465a9783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intranasal</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza A virus</topic><topic>Influenza A virus - immunology</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Poisson Distribution</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichol, Kristin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelman, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallon, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorse, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belshe, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glezen, W. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittes, Janet</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichol, Kristin L</au><au>Mendelman, Paul M</au><au>Mallon, Kenneth P</au><au>Jackson, Lisa A</au><au>Gorse, Geoffrey J</au><au>Belshe, Robert B</au><au>Glezen, W. Paul</au><au>Wittes, Janet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>1999-07-14</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>282</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>137-144</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life,
and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered
trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness,
absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September
1997 through March 1998. SETTING Thirteen centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years recruited
through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general population.
INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally administered
trivalent LAIV vaccine (n=3041) or placebo (n=1520) in the fall of 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness, febrile upper respiratory
tract illness, work loss, and health care use during the peak and total influenza
outbreak periods, and adverse events. RESULTS Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more febrile
illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2% for vaccine
vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination
significantly reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction;
95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract
illnesses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to
fewer days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses; 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of work
lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for febrile
upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care provider
visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduction for
febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription antibiotics
and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illness syndromes.
Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose or sore throat
during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adverse events between
the groups were not significantly different. The match between the type A(H3N2)
vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2])
for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggesting that LAIV provided substantial
cross-protection against this variant influenza A virus strain. CONCLUSION Intranasal trivalent LAIV vaccine was safe and effective in healthy,
working adults in a year in which a drifted influenza A virus predominated.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>10411194</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.282.2.137</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 1999-07, Vol.282 (2), p.137-144 |
issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69892357 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Administration, Intranasal Adult Biological and medical sciences Cost of Illness Disease Outbreaks Double-Blind Method Female Human viral diseases Humans Infectious diseases Influenza Influenza A virus Influenza A virus - immunology Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects Influenza Vaccines - immunology Influenza, Human - epidemiology Influenza, Human - prevention & control Linear Models Male Medical research Medical sciences Middle Aged Poisson Distribution Seasons Vaccines Vaccines, Attenuated - administration & dosage Vaccines, Attenuated - adverse effects Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology Viral diseases Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases Viruses |
title | Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Live,%20Attenuated%20Intranasal%20Influenza%20Virus%20Vaccine%20in%20Healthy,%20Working%20Adults:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Nichol,%20Kristin%20L&rft.date=1999-07-14&rft.volume=282&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=137-144&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.282.2.137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69892357%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211377043&rft_id=info:pmid/10411194&rft_ama_id=302147&rfr_iscdi=true |