Effectiveness of Live, Attenuated Intranasal Influenza Virus Vaccine in Healthy, Working Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life, and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness, absenteeis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1999-07, Vol.282 (2), p.137-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Influenza virus is a major cause of illness, disruption to daily life,
and increased use of health care in all age groups. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of intranasally administered
trivalent, live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccine for reducing illness,
absenteeism, and health care use among healthy, working adults. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from September
1997 through March 1998. SETTING Thirteen centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4561 healthy, working adults aged 18 to 64 years recruited
through health insurance plans, at work sites, and from the general population.
INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive intranasally administered
trivalent LAIV vaccine (n=3041) or placebo (n=1520) in the fall of 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episodes of febrile illness, severe febrile illness, febrile upper respiratory
tract illness, work loss, and health care use during the peak and total influenza
outbreak periods, and adverse events. RESULTS Recipients of LAIV vaccine were as likely to experience 1 or more febrile
illnesses as placebo recipients during peak outbreak periods (13.2% for vaccine
vs 14.6% for placebo; P=.19). However, vaccination
significantly reduced the numbers of severe febrile illnesses (18.8% reduction;
95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-28.8%) and febrile upper respiratory tract
illnesses (23.6% reduction; 95% CI, 12.7%-33.2%). Vaccination also led to
fewer days of illness across all illness syndromes (22.9% reduction for febrile
illnesses; 27.3% reduction for severe febrile illnesses), fewer days of work
lost (17.9% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 28.4% reduction for febrile
upper respiratory tract illnesses), and fewer days with health care provider
visits (24.8% reduction for severe febrile illnesses; 40.9% reduction for
febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses). Use of prescription antibiotics
and over-the-counter medications was also reduced across all illness syndromes.
Vaccine recipients were more likely to experience runny nose or sore throat
during the first 7 days after vaccination, but serious adverse events between
the groups were not significantly different. The match between the type A(H3N2)
vaccine strain and the predominant circulating virus strain (A/Sydney/05/97[H3N2])
for the 1997-1998 season was poor, suggesting that LAIV provided substantial
cross-protection against this variant influenza A virus strain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.282.2.137 |