Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in Monitoring First-Line Chemotherapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases. Experimental Design: In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2008-12, Vol.14 (23), p.7813-7821
Hauptverfasser: HOLDENRIEDER, Stefan, VON PAWEL, Joachim, RAITH, Hannelore, NAGEL, Dorothea, STIEBER, Petra, DANKELMANN, Eike, DUELL, Thomas, FADERL, Bernhard, MARKUS, Andreas, SIAKAVARA, Maria, WAGNER, Horst, FELDMANN, Knut, HOFFMANN, Harald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases. Experimental Design: In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, the courses of nucleosomes, progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), and carcinoembryonic antigen were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by computed tomography before start of the third treatment course. Results: In univariate analyses, high levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 during the first and second cycles of therapy correlated with poor outcome. Insufficient response to therapy was most efficiently indicated by the baseline values of nucleosomes, ProGRP, and CYFRA 21-1 before the second therapy cycle reaching areas under the curve (AUC) of 81.8%, 71.3%, and 74.9% in receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. Combinations of nucleosomes with ProGRP (AUC 84.1%), CYFRA 21-1 (AUC 82.5%), and NSE (AUC 83.6%) further improved the diagnostic power in the high specificity range and yielded sensitivities of 47.1%, 35.3%, and 35.3% at 95% specificity, respectively. In multivariate analyses, including clinical and biochemical variables, only performance score and nucleosomes before cycle 2 were found to independently indicate therapy response. Conclusions: Biochemical markers specifically identified patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and showed to be valuable for diseases management of small cell lung cancer.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0678