Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in Monitoring First-Line Chemotherapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer
Purpose: Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases. Experimental Design: In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2008-12, Vol.14 (23), p.7813-7821 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve
the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases.
Experimental Design: In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy,
the courses of nucleosomes, progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragments
(CYFRA 21-1), and carcinoembryonic antigen were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by computed
tomography before start of the third treatment course.
Results: In univariate analyses, high levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 during the first
and second cycles of therapy correlated with poor outcome. Insufficient response to therapy was most efficiently indicated
by the baseline values of nucleosomes, ProGRP, and CYFRA 21-1 before the second therapy cycle reaching areas under the curve
(AUC) of 81.8%, 71.3%, and 74.9% in receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. Combinations of nucleosomes with
ProGRP (AUC 84.1%), CYFRA 21-1 (AUC 82.5%), and NSE (AUC 83.6%) further improved the diagnostic power in the high specificity
range and yielded sensitivities of 47.1%, 35.3%, and 35.3% at 95% specificity, respectively. In multivariate analyses, including
clinical and biochemical variables, only performance score and nucleosomes before cycle 2 were found to independently indicate
therapy response.
Conclusions: Biochemical markers specifically identified patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and
showed to be valuable for diseases management of small cell lung cancer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0678 |