Survey on chest drainage systems adopted in Europe

a Division of Oesophageal and Pulmonary Surgery, University of Bologna, Villa Maria Cecilia e San Pier Damiano Hospitals, Cotignola and Faenza (Ravenna), Italy b Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK Corresponding author. Università degli Studi di Bologna –...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2008-12, Vol.7 (6), p.1155-1159
Hauptverfasser: Mattioli, Sandro, Berrisford, Richard G, Lugaresi, Maria Luisa, Aramini, Beatrice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:a Division of Oesophageal and Pulmonary Surgery, University of Bologna, Villa Maria Cecilia e San Pier Damiano Hospitals, Cotignola and Faenza (Ravenna), Italy b Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK Corresponding author. Università degli Studi di Bologna – Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e dei Trapianti d'Organo- Via Massarenti 9 – 40138 Bologna, Italy. Tel.: +39 051 6364870; fax: +39 051 347431. E-mail address : sandro.mattioli{at}unibo.it (S. Mattioli). The aim of this survey, promoted by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, was to acquire information and advice from ‘the field’ in order to promote development of technology for thoracic surgery and to provide information for future guidelines on chest drainage. Society members were offered a questionnaire on the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons website (November 2006) composed of seven sections comprehending 21 detailed items. The questionnaire was completed by 120 centres, 100% performed lung surgery, 91.6% mediastinal surgery, 54.1% oesophageal surgery, 10% cardiothoracic surgery. The PVC straight drain (mean 55.9%) and silicon drain (mean 38.4%), water-valve/water suction disposable chest drainage collection system (mean 43.4%), one bottle (mean 24.8%), and two bottles with suction control (mean 18.2%), were the most frequently used. After pneumonectomy 51.2% used a balanced drainage system, 9% periodical thoracocentesis, 39.8% others. In 57.5–92% drainage suction was stopped 4 postoperative days and in 8–42.5% >4 postoperative days. In 17.6–60.7% drains were removed 4 postoperative days and in 39.3–82.4% >4 postoperative days. The survey demonstrates a trend toward the use of updated technical devices, high consideration of the costs, and clinical practice based on personal preferences. Key Words: Thoracic surgery; Chest drainage systems; Chest; Lung; Mediastinum; Oesophagus Related Article eComment: A tribute to Gotthard Bülau and Vincenzo Monaldi Karsten Knobloch Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 1159. [Full Text] [PDF]
ISSN:1569-9293
1569-9285
DOI:10.1510/icvts.2008.181750