A Validated Grading Scale for Forehead Lines

BACKGROUND As with other facial wrinkles, the gradual loss and disorganization of collagen fibers and elastin, connective tissues that provide underlying support for skin, cause horizontal forehead rhytides in large part. OBJECTIVES To develop the Forehead Lines Grading Scale for objective quantific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2008-11, Vol.34, p.S155-S160
Hauptverfasser: CARRUTHERS, ALASTAIR, CARRUTHERS, JEAN, HARDAS, BHUSHAN, KAUR, MANDEEP, GOERTELMEYER, ROMAN, JONES, DEREK, RZANY, BERTHOLD, COHEN, JOEL, KERSCHER, MARTINA, FLYNN, TIMOTHY CORCORAN, MAAS, COREY, SATTLER, GERHARD, GEBAUER, ALEXANDER, POOTH, RAINER, MCCLURE, KATHLEEN, SIMONE‐KORBEL, ULLI, BUCHNER, LARRY
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND As with other facial wrinkles, the gradual loss and disorganization of collagen fibers and elastin, connective tissues that provide underlying support for skin, cause horizontal forehead rhytides in large part. OBJECTIVES To develop the Forehead Lines Grading Scale for objective quantification of horizontal forehead rhytides at rest and with expression and to establish the reliability of this photonumeric scale for clinical research and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Forehead Lines Grading Scale is a 5‐point photonumeric rating scale that was developed to objectively quantify resting (static) and hyperkinetic (dynamic) forehead lines. Inter‐ and intrarater variability was assessed by computing intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS The agreement between the experts was highly significant. Bubble plots (bivariate scatter plots) demonstrated linearity in judgment by the experts. CONCLUSION The 5‐point photonumeric scale generated spans the severity of forehead lines for which patients commonly seek correction. The scale is well stratified for consistent rating.
ISSN:1076-0512
1524-4725
DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34364.x