Myoblast Transplantation for Cardiac Repair: From Automyoblast to Allomyoblast Transplantation
Background We sought to compare host immune cell kinetics, survival profile of donor skeletal myoblasts, and skeletal myoblast graft efficacy after autologous and allogeneic skeletal myoblast transplantation into a rat model of myocardial infarction. Methods One week after myocardial infarction, 128...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of thoracic surgery 2008-12, Vol.86 (6), p.1841-1848 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background We sought to compare host immune cell kinetics, survival profile of donor skeletal myoblasts, and skeletal myoblast graft efficacy after autologous and allogeneic skeletal myoblast transplantation into a rat model of myocardial infarction. Methods One week after myocardial infarction, 128 animals were divided into four groups: group 1 (n = 24, receiving medium only), group 2 (n = 24, receiving medium and cyclosporine), group 3 (n = 40, autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation), and group 4 (n = 40, allogeneic skeletal myoblast transplantation with cyclosporine treatment). Rats were euthanized 10 minutes, 1 day, and 4, 7, and 28 days later. Host immune cell kinetics were assessed by immunohistochemical studies for macrophages, and CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. Donor skeletal myoblast survival was confirmed by tracking prelabeled signals, and quantified by β-gal assay. Heart function was evaluated by echocardiography. Results A transient immune cell infiltration was demonstrated in group 3, with macrophage infiltration on day 1 and day 4, CD8+ cell infiltration on day 4 and day 7, and CD4+ cell infiltration on day 4. In group 4, immunocyte infiltration was slightly more severe than that in group 3. Automyoblasts and allomyoblasts showed no significant difference of survival from day 1 to day 7 ( p > 0.10); however, on day 28, automyoblasts showed better survival than allomyoblasts ( p < 0.05). Transplantation of allomyoblasts increased systolic heart function and limited heart dilation after myocardial injury to a similar degree as automyoblasts ( p > 0.10). Conclusions The use of allomyoblasts is feasible and effective for cardiac repair with immunosuppressive treatment as compared with automyoblasts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-4975 1552-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.038 |