Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Advanced maternal age (AMA) is an important parameter that negatively influences the clinical pregnancy rate in IVF, in particular owing to the increased embryo aneuploidy rate. It has thus been suggested that only transferring euploid embryos in this patient group would improve the pregn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2008-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2806-2812
Hauptverfasser: Hardarson, T., Hanson, C., Lundin, K., Hillensjö, T., Nilsson, L., Stevic, J., Reismer, E., Borg, K., Wikland, M., Bergh, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Advanced maternal age (AMA) is an important parameter that negatively influences the clinical pregnancy rate in IVF, in particular owing to the increased embryo aneuploidy rate. It has thus been suggested that only transferring euploid embryos in this patient group would improve the pregnancy rate. The purpose of this study was to test whether employing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in AMA patients would increase the clinical pregnancy rate. METHODS We conducted a two-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to analyze the outcome of embryo transfers in AMA patients (≥38 years of age) after PGS using FISH analysis for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18, 21 and 22. The PGS group was compared with a control group. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate after 6–7 weeks of gestation per randomized patient. RESULTS The study was terminated early as an interim analysis showed a very low conditional power of superiority for the primary outcome. Of the 320 patients calculated to be included in the study, 56 and 53 patients were randomized into the PGS and control groups, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate in the PGS group was 8.9% (95% CI, 2.9–19.6%) compared with 24.5% (95% CI, 13.8–38.3%) in the control group, giving a difference of 15.6% (95% CI, 1.8–29.4%, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS Although the study was terminated early, this RCT study provides evidence against the use of PGS for AMA patients when performing IVF. Trial registration number: ISRCTN38014610.
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/den217