Comparing Hospitals

To the Editor: Chen et al. (Jan. 28 issue) 1 found that mortality rates for patients with myocardial infarction were lower at top-ranked hospitals than at others. Although the study was well done, it is premature to conclude that hospital rankings by commercial magazines are valuable. This conclusio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1999-06, Vol.340 (25), p.2006-2007
Hauptverfasser: Hartz, A, Graber, M, Doebbeling, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Chen et al. (Jan. 28 issue) 1 found that mortality rates for patients with myocardial infarction were lower at top-ranked hospitals than at others. Although the study was well done, it is premature to conclude that hospital rankings by commercial magazines are valuable. This conclusion depends on three assumptions that must be validated. The first assumption is that the risk-adjustment procedure was adequate. Even good risk-adjustment procedures may not take into account systematic differences in risk among hospitals. Possible sources of systematic differences include variations in the following factors: the response time of paramedical services and the technology . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199906243402518