In Vivo Microscopic Assessment of Cremasteric Microcirculation during Hindlimb Allograft Rejection in Rats

Experimental and clinical studies of vascular allogenic extremity transplantation have yielded disappointing results and have not been clinically useful. With recent advances in transplantation immunology, considerable interest has focused on the understanding of leukocyteendothelial interaction at the microcirculatory level. The objective of this study was to characterize the alterations in leukocyte-endothelial interaction in the early stages of rat hindlimb allograft rejection. To study the changes at the microcirculatory level, a new microsurgical model was developed; the cremaster muscle was incorporated into the transplanted hindlimb. The purpose of this study was to report on the microcirculatory changes during rat hindlimb allograft rejection.A total of 24 transplantations were performed among the four experimental groups. In a control group, 12 rat hindlimb-cremaster grafts were transplanted between genetically identical animals, Lewis to Lewis. Microcirculatory measurements of graft survival were taken at 24 hours (group 1A, n = 6) and at 72 hours (group 1B, n = 6). In the rejection control group, 12 transplantations were performed across a major histocompatibility barrier between Lewis-Brown Norway and Lewis rats. Microcirculatory measurements were taken at 24 (group 2A, n = 6) and 72 hours (group 2A, n = 6) as above. The following parameters were evaluated to discover the leukocyte-endothelial interactionendothelial edema index and the number of rolling, adherent, and transmigrating leukocytes and lymphocytes in the postcapillary venule. Physical signs of limb rejection, such as edema, erythema, scaling, plaque formation on the skin, hair loss, and skin surface temperature, were monitored.Microcirculatory signs of rejection included the following. There was a significant increase in the number of adherent leukocytes in allograft transplants at both 24 hours (205 percent; 2.05 ± 0.38) and 72 hours (431 percent; 9.11 ± 3.41) when compared with isograft controls (1.00 ± 0.89 at 24 hours; 2.11 ± 0.34 at 72 hours) (p < 0.05). The activation of leukocyte transmigration increased more than 7-fold in muscle allografts at 24 hours (0.55 ± 0.25 versus 4.16 ± 1.89) and more than 6-fold at 72 hours (0.72 ± 0.38 versus 4.38 ± 1.28) after transplantation (p < 0.05). Endothelial edema index, a measure of endothelial swelling and cellular deposit accumulation, increased more than 119 percent in the allograft group 72 hours after transplantation (1.23 ± 0.07 ve