Quality improvement in a publicly provided long-term care system: the case of Norway
Objective To explore the extent to which quality improvement activities are implemented in the Norwegian long-term care system for older people, and to determine if variations in the extent and scope of quality improvement activities are associated with the characteristics of the first-line care lea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for quality in health care 2008-12, Vol.20 (6), p.433-438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To explore the extent to which quality improvement activities are implemented in the Norwegian long-term care system for older people, and to determine if variations in the extent and scope of quality improvement activities are associated with the characteristics of the first-line care leaders, the sector or the size of the municipality. Design A cross-sectional telephone survey supplemented with information from public records and official municipal websites. Data were organized according to six total quality management components, and a sum score was developed to measure quality improvement. Variations in the extent of quality improvement activities were analysed using multivariate analysis. Setting Thirty-two Norwegian municipalities stratified according to region and population size. Participants Sixty-four first-line leaders in nursing homes and home-based care. Main outcome measure A sum score has been used as a measure of quality improvement activities. Results The unit's quality improvement activities varied by quality improvement components and by municipality. The technical component that requires training in tools and techniques was low; the general components as ‘leader's involvement’ and ‘employee participation’ were more common. The size of the populations of the municipalities showed a significant independent association with the scope of quality activities. Conclusions The six quality improvement components varied from high to extremely low, and the large municipalities had more quality activities than small- or medium-sized municipalities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1353-4505 1464-3677 |
DOI: | 10.1093/intqhc/mzn031 |