A prospective randomized multicentre comparison of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and gelatin-sealed knitted Dacron grafts for femoropopliteal bypass

Purpose: To compare graft patency between expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and gelatin-sealed knitted Dacron for femoropopliteal bypass. Methods: A prospective, multicentre trial was performed in 108 patients randomized to receive either a PTFE or Dacron prosthetic graft. Distal anastomosis w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular surgery (London, England) England), 1999-03, Vol.7 (2), p.214-218
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, B.I, Fletcher, J.P, Tomlinson, P, Allen, R.D.M, Hazelton, S.J, Richardson, A.J, Stuchbery, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To compare graft patency between expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and gelatin-sealed knitted Dacron for femoropopliteal bypass. Methods: A prospective, multicentre trial was performed in 108 patients randomized to receive either a PTFE or Dacron prosthetic graft. Distal anastomosis was above knee in 75 and below knee in 33 patients. Results: Primary patency at 1, 2 and 3 years was 72, 52 and 52% for PTFE, and 70, 56 and 47% for Dacron ( P=0.87). Secondary patency at 1, 2 and 3 years was 74, 54 and 54% for PTFE and 78, 70 and 53% for Dacron ( P=0.39). The most significant predictors of early graft failure were poor vessel run-off ( P=0.04) and critical limb ischaemia ( P=0.04). Conclusion: There was no difference in graft patency between PTFE and Dacron for femoropopliteal bypass.
ISSN:0967-2109
DOI:10.1016/S0967-2109(98)00126-4