Temperature dependent characteristics of a recombinant infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus glycoprotein produced in insect cells

A recombinant infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) glycoprotein (G protein) was produced in insect cells using a baculovirus vector (Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus). Characteristics of this protein were evaluated in relation to native viral G protein. A full-length (1.6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of aquatic organisms 1999-04, Vol.36 (1), p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: CAIN, K. D, BYRNE, K. M, BRASSFIELD, A. L, LAPATRA, S. E, RISTOW, S. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A recombinant infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) glycoprotein (G protein) was produced in insect cells using a baculovirus vector (Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus). Characteristics of this protein were evaluated in relation to native viral G protein. A full-length (1.6 kb) cDNA copy of the glycoprotein gene of IHNV was inserted into the baculovirus vector under control of the polyhedrin promoter. High levels of G protein (approximately 0.5 microgram/1 x 10(5) cells) were produced in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells following recombinant baculovirus infection. Analysis of cell lysates by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blot revealed a recombinant IHNV G of slightly higher mobility on the gel than the viral G protein. Differences in mobility were abrogated by endoglycosidase treatment. When the recombinant G protein was produced in insect cells at 20 degrees C (RecGlow), immunostaining and cell fusion activity demonstrated surface localization of the protein. In contrast, when recombinant protein was produced at 27 degrees C (RecGhigh), G protein was sequestered within the cell, suggesting that at the 2 different temperatures processing differences may exist. Eleven monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were tested by immunoblotting for reactivity to the recombinant G protein. All 11 MAbs reacted to the reduced proteins. Four MAbs recognized both RecGhigh and RecGlow under non-reducing conditions; however, 1 neutralizing MAb (92A) recognized RecGlow but failed to react to RecGhigh under non-reducing conditions. This suggests that differences exist between RecGlow and RecGhigh which may have implications in the development of a properly folded recombinant G protein with the ability to elicit protective immunity in fish.
ISSN:0177-5103
1616-1580
DOI:10.3354/dao036001