Methodological Issues in Evaluating Rorschach Validity: A Comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996)

Discusses three recent studies of the validity of Rorschach test (H. Rorschach, 1921) that have not evaluated methodological issues carefully. Identifies methodological errors in each study and offers specific information for the interpretation of Rorschach results. (SLD)

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 1999-06, Vol.6 (2), p.115-129
Hauptverfasser:	Wood, James M, Nezworski, M. Teresa, Stejskal, William J, Garven, Sena, West, Stephen G
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Depression - diagnosis Humans Interpersonal Relations Logistic Models MMPI - standards Personality Assessment Personality Measures Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards Psychopathology Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Research Design - standards Research Methodology Research Problems Rorschach Test Rorschach Test - standards Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology Stress, Psychological - diagnosis Test Interpretation Test Validity
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Discusses three recent studies of the validity of Rorschach test (H. Rorschach, 1921) that have not evaluated methodological issues carefully. Identifies methodological errors in each study and offers specific information for the interpretation of Rorschach results. (SLD)
ISSN:	1073-1911 1552-3489
DOI:	10.1177/107319119900600202