18F-FDG-PET of musculoskeletal tumors: a correlation with the expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II

Objective It remains controversial whether positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro- d -glucose (F-18-FDG) can differentiate between benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. To uncover the mechanism of F-18-FDG accumulations, we analyzed the correlation between the F-18-FDG...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2008-10, Vol.22 (8), p.699-705
Hauptverfasser: Hamada, Kenichiro, Tomita, Yasuhiko, Qiu, Ying, Zhang, Binglin, Ueda, Takafumi, Myoui, Akira, Higuchi, Ichiro, Yoshikawa, Hideki, Aozasa, Katsuyuki, Hatazawa, Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective It remains controversial whether positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro- d -glucose (F-18-FDG) can differentiate between benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. To uncover the mechanism of F-18-FDG accumulations, we analyzed the correlation between the F-18-FDG accumulation and the expression of glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) and hexokinase II (HK-II) in benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Methods The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max ) of F-18-FDG in 24 benign and 26 malignant musculoskeletal tumors were compared with the histologic malignancies, and the expression of Glut-1 and HK-II was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Results The SUV max for malignant tumors (6.33 ± 4.79) was significantly higher than those with benign tumors (3.47 ± 3.12, P < 0.01). The expression of Glut-1 was high in 12 patients (all malignant) and low in 38 patients (24 benign and 14 malignant), and the expression of HK-II was high in 36 patients (11 benign and 25 malignant) and low in 14 patients (13 benign and 1 malignant). Cases with high expression of Glut-1 and HK-II at immunohistochemistry showed a higher SUV max than those with low expression (Glut-1 8.03 ± 5.10 and 3.98 ± 3.53, P < 0.01; HK-II 5.73 ± 4.49 and 2.99 ± 3.02, P < 0.01). No significant dividing threshold of the SUV max of F-18 FDG was found for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors or for the expression of Glut-1 and HK-II. Conclusions The limited capability of F-18 FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors is owing partly to the various levels of Glut-1 and HK-II expression in individual tumors.
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-008-0173-9