Patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge

Controlled laboratory biomechanics study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. To compare patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Although weight-bearing forward-lunge exercises are frequently employed during reh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2008-11, Vol.38 (11), p.681-690
Hauptverfasser: Escamilla, Rafael F, Zheng, Naiquan, Macleod, Toran D, Edwards, W Brent, Hreljac, Alan, Fleisig, Glenn S, Wilk, Kevin E, Moorman, 3rd, Claude T, Imamura, Rodney, Andrews, James R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Controlled laboratory biomechanics study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. To compare patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Although weight-bearing forward-lunge exercises are frequently employed during rehabilitation for individuals with patellofemoral joint syndrome, patellofemoral joint force and stress and how they change with variations of the lunge exercise are currently unknown. Eighteen subjects used their 12-repetition maximum weight while performing a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Electromyography, ground reaction force, and kinematic variables were put into a biomechanical optimization model, and patellofemoral joint force and stress were calculated as a function of knee angle. Visual observation of the data show that during the forward lunge, patellofemoral joint force and stress increased progressively as knee flexion increased, and decreased progressively as knee flexion decreased. Between 70 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a short step compared to a long step (P
ISSN:0190-6011
1938-1344
DOI:10.2519/jospt.2008.2694