Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care
Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family practice 1999-02, Vol.16 (1), p.78-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 83 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Family practice |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rose, Peter Humm, Edwina Hey, Kate Jones, Linda Huson, Susan M |
description | Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of non-attenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. Results. In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. Conclusions. It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/fampra/16.1.78 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69740564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69740564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-dcda36bfbd53b78123a041a8085beeaff606c4b96a7b0f36992a01bc363afd603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtPwzAUhS0EgvJYGVHEwJb22o7tZGBA5VEeEgtIiMW6cRwIbZJiJxL8e1ylQoil05V8Px8fn0PIMYUxhYxPSqyXDidUjulYpVtkRBMJMWMs2yYjYJLHjHK5R_a9_wAApYTaJXsUOKMJ0BE5v8a6WnxH75XvWvcddTivmrcImyJ6s43tKhOZtm-8XSxW51UTLV1VYyANOntIdkpceHu0ngfk-frqaTqLHx5vbqcXD7FJRNrFhSmQy7zMC8FzlVLGERKKKaQitxbLUoI0SZ5JVDmUXGYZQ6C54ZJjWUjgB-Rs0F269rO3vtN15U3whI1te69lphIQMtkIChUSYEF3E8iCSS7U6unTf-BH27sm_FbTLBMhRRABGg-Qca33zpZ6nZKmoFc96aEnTaWmWqXhwslatc9rW_zBh2ICEA9A6MV-_e7RzbVUXAk9e3nV93fTu8uny1QD_wEkMp1u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199514005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rose, Peter ; Humm, Edwina ; Hey, Kate ; Jones, Linda ; Huson, Susan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Peter ; Humm, Edwina ; Hey, Kate ; Jones, Linda ; Huson, Susan M</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of non-attenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. Results. In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. Conclusions. It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.78</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10321401</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAPREH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Construction ; Family histories ; Family history ; Family Practice ; Female ; General practice ; Genetic Counseling - methods ; Genetic counselling ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Medical History Taking - methods ; Pedigree ; primary care ; Referral and Consultation</subject><ispartof>Family practice, 1999-02, Vol.16 (1), p.78-83</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-dcda36bfbd53b78123a041a8085beeaff606c4b96a7b0f36992a01bc363afd603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-dcda36bfbd53b78123a041a8085beeaff606c4b96a7b0f36992a01bc363afd603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10321401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humm, Edwina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huson, Susan M</creatorcontrib><title>Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care</title><title>Family practice</title><addtitle>Family Practice</addtitle><description>Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of non-attenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. Results. In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. Conclusions. It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Family histories</subject><subject>Family history</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Genetic Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Genetic counselling</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical History Taking - methods</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>primary care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><issn>0263-2136</issn><issn>1460-2229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtPwzAUhS0EgvJYGVHEwJb22o7tZGBA5VEeEgtIiMW6cRwIbZJiJxL8e1ylQoil05V8Px8fn0PIMYUxhYxPSqyXDidUjulYpVtkRBMJMWMs2yYjYJLHjHK5R_a9_wAApYTaJXsUOKMJ0BE5v8a6WnxH75XvWvcddTivmrcImyJ6s43tKhOZtm-8XSxW51UTLV1VYyANOntIdkpceHu0ngfk-frqaTqLHx5vbqcXD7FJRNrFhSmQy7zMC8FzlVLGERKKKaQitxbLUoI0SZ5JVDmUXGYZQ6C54ZJjWUjgB-Rs0F269rO3vtN15U3whI1te69lphIQMtkIChUSYEF3E8iCSS7U6unTf-BH27sm_FbTLBMhRRABGg-Qca33zpZ6nZKmoFc96aEnTaWmWqXhwslatc9rW_zBh2ICEA9A6MV-_e7RzbVUXAk9e3nV93fTu8uny1QD_wEkMp1u</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Rose, Peter</creator><creator>Humm, Edwina</creator><creator>Hey, Kate</creator><creator>Jones, Linda</creator><creator>Huson, Susan M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care</title><author>Rose, Peter ; Humm, Edwina ; Hey, Kate ; Jones, Linda ; Huson, Susan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-dcda36bfbd53b78123a041a8085beeaff606c4b96a7b0f36992a01bc363afd603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Family histories</topic><topic>Family history</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Genetic Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Genetic counselling</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical History Taking - methods</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>primary care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humm, Edwina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huson, Susan M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Peter</au><au>Humm, Edwina</au><au>Hey, Kate</au><au>Jones, Linda</au><au>Huson, Susan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care</atitle><jtitle>Family practice</jtitle><addtitle>Family Practice</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>78-83</pages><issn>0263-2136</issn><eissn>1460-2229</eissn><coden>FAPREH</coden><abstract>Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of non-attenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. Results. In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. Conclusions. It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10321401</pmid><doi>10.1093/fampra/16.1.78</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-2136 |
ispartof | Family practice, 1999-02, Vol.16 (1), p.78-83 |
issn | 0263-2136 1460-2229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69740564 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Construction Family histories Family history Family Practice Female General practice Genetic Counseling - methods Genetic counselling Genetic Testing - methods Humans Male Medical History Taking - methods Pedigree primary care Referral and Consultation |
title | Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A07%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20history%20taking%20and%20genetic%20counselling%20in%20primary%20care&rft.jtitle=Family%20practice&rft.au=Rose,%20Peter&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=78-83&rft.issn=0263-2136&rft.eissn=1460-2229&rft.coden=FAPREH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/fampra/16.1.78&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69740564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199514005&rft_id=info:pmid/10321401&rfr_iscdi=true |