Family history taking and genetic counselling in primary care

Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were inv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family practice 1999-02, Vol.16 (1), p.78-83
Hauptverfasser: Rose, Peter, Humm, Edwina, Hey, Kate, Jones, Linda, Huson, Susan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of taking routine family histories and subsequent counselling. Methods. The study was set in primary care in the UK. The subjects were patients between the ages of 20 and 34 years registered at one general practice. Patients were invited by letter to attend a clinic in their GP surgery, run by a GP and health visitor. A family history was constructed and counselling undertaken for any identified problems. A telephone survey of a sample of non-attenders was also performed. The outcome measures were attendance rate, patient views, patient anxiety as measured by the short form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and referrals to secondary care. Results. In total, 16.1% patients attended the clinic; 40.3 % had a family history of at least one disease with a possible genetic component. Anxiety levels fell immediately after the consultation and rose to pre-clinic levels at 12 weeks. The clinic generated three referrals to secondary care and a further seven patients who were counselled by the investigators following advice from a consultant geneticist. Conclusions. It is possible to take detailed family histories and provide genetic counselling advice in primary care with minimal training of clinical primary care staff. The service is acceptable to patients, does not induce anxiety and has little effect on numbers of patients referred.
ISSN:0263-2136
1460-2229
DOI:10.1093/fampra/16.1.78