Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation

Objectives. To compare the ability of different biopsy schemes to detect cancer and predict tumor volume using our previously described prostate biopsy simulation system. In addition, we used the simulation system to evaluate the optimal location of transition zone biopsies. Methods. Digital reconst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1999-05, Vol.53 (5), p.951-960
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Michael E, Troncoso, Patricia, Tang, Kuang, Babaian, R.Joseph, Johnston, Dennis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. To compare the ability of different biopsy schemes to detect cancer and predict tumor volume using our previously described prostate biopsy simulation system. In addition, we used the simulation system to evaluate the optimal location of transition zone biopsies. Methods. Digital reconstructions of 180 radical prostatectomy specimens were used. Forty simulations were performed on each prostate for 10 biopsy schemes, including a previously reported five-region peripheral zone biopsy pattern and a new 11-core multisite-directed scheme consisting of sextant, two transition zone, one midline, and two anterior horn biopsies. For simulation of the transition zone biopsies, paired near-midline biopsies were simulated, with needle insertion points from the apex to the base of the prostate and with needle advances of 1 to 4 cm before firing. A total of 1,180,800 individual biopsy tracks were simulated. Results. The 11-core multisite-directed biopsy scheme had the highest detection rate for cancers greater than 0.5 cc. This scheme reliably detected cancer in 94% (138 of 147) of the cases. These results were significantly better than those of the sextant biopsy scheme (P
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00639-6