A prospective PETHEMA study of tandem autologous transplantation versus autograft followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

One hundred ten patients with multiple myeloma (MM) failing to achieve at least near-complete remission (nCR) after a first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were scheduled to receive a second ASCT (85 patients) or a reduced-intensity-conditioning allograft (allo-RIC; 25 patients), dependi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2008-11, Vol.112 (9), p.3591-3593
Hauptverfasser: Rosiñol, Laura, Pérez-Simón, José Antonio, Sureda, Anna, de la Rubia, Javier, de Arriba, Felipe, Lahuerta, Juan José, González, José David, Díaz-Mediavilla, Joaquín, Hernández, Belén, García-Frade, Javier, Carrera, Dolores, León, Angel, Hernández, Miguel, Abellán, Pascual Fernández, Bergua, Juan Miguel, San Miguel, Jesús, Bladé, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One hundred ten patients with multiple myeloma (MM) failing to achieve at least near-complete remission (nCR) after a first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were scheduled to receive a second ASCT (85 patients) or a reduced-intensity-conditioning allograft (allo-RIC; 25 patients), depending on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–identical sibling donor availability. There was a higher increase in complete remission (CR) rate (40% vs 11%, P = .001) and a trend toward a longer progression-free survival (PFS; median, 31 months vs not reached, P = .08) in favor of allo-RIC. In contrast, it was associated with a trend toward a higher transplantation-related mortality (16% vs 5%, P = .07), a 66% chance of chronic graft-versus-host disease and no statistical difference in event-free survival and overall survival. Although the PFS plateau observed with allo-RIC is very encouraging, this procedure is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and therefore it should still be considered investigational and restricted to well-designed prospective clinical trials. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID number NCT00560053
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2008-02-141598