Comparison of Clinical Features of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy in Men Versus Women
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heart muscle disease characterized by myocardial necrosis followed by fibrous-fatty replacement. The pathologic process constitutes the basis for ventricular arrhythmias due to re-entrant circuits. Even if this genetic disease is transmitte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 2008-11, Vol.102 (9), p.1252-1257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heart muscle disease characterized by myocardial necrosis followed by fibrous-fatty replacement. The pathologic process constitutes the basis for ventricular arrhythmias due to re-entrant circuits. Even if this genetic disease is transmitted in the majority of cases with autosomal dominant trait, in all reported series ARVC is prevalent in men. In this study we investigate the impact that gender may have on clinical presentation in a large series of patients with ARVC. A total of 171 consecutive patients (mean 29 ± 12 years, range 13 to 65) affected by ARVC were examined with family and personal history, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-hour ECG, signal-averaged ECG, and echocardiogram. Moreover, electrophysiological study and ventricular angiography were performed in selected cases. In the 171 subjects, 71% were men and 29% women (p = 0.02). No gender differences were found considering the age at the time of diagnosis and of study enrolment and the prevalence of index cases and family members. The genders differed in prevalence of abnormal ECG (69% vs 52%, p = 0.036) and presence of late potentials (60% vs 40%, p = 0.01). Moreover, men had larger right ventricular dimensions and practiced competitive sports more frequently (26% vs 14%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.054 |