The MELD-Na is an independent short- and long-term prognostic predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective survey
Abstract Background and aim Serum sodium has been suggested to incorporate into the model for end-stage liver disease to enhance its prognostic ability for cirrhosis. A mathematical equation based on model for end-stage liver disease and sodium, known as “MELD-Na”, was developed for outcome predicti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive and liver disease 2008-11, Vol.40 (11), p.882-889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background and aim Serum sodium has been suggested to incorporate into the model for end-stage liver disease to enhance its prognostic ability for cirrhosis. A mathematical equation based on model for end-stage liver disease and sodium, known as “MELD-Na”, was developed for outcome prediction for cirrhosis. The severity of liver cirrhosis is a key component to predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This study investigated the prognostic role of MELD-Na for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients and methods A total of 535 unselected hepatocellular carcinoma patients were prospectively enrolled to evaluate the performance of MELD-Na. Results The MELD-Na was better than model for end-stage liver disease in predicting 6-month mortality by comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (0.782 vs. 0.761, p = 0.101). MELD-Na, but not model for end-stage liver disease, was an independent predictor associated with 6-month mortality in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio: 1.14, p = 0.001). In the survival analysis, MELD-Na also independently predicted mortality, with an additional risk of 4.3% per unit increment of the score ( p < 0.001). Patients with MELD-Na scores between 10 and 20 and scores >20 had 2.1-fold ( p < 0.001) and 7.5-fold ( p < 0.001) risk of mortality, respectively, compared to patients with a score |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1590-8658 1878-3562 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dld.2008.01.015 |