Comparison of the prognostic value of qualitative versus quantitative stress tomographic perfusion imaging

This study compared qualitative assessment of exercise thallium imaging to quantitative assessment in predicting outcome in 713 patients with 78% prevalence of coronary artery disease by coronary angiography; during a mean follow-up of 52 months, there were 106 hard cardiac events (death or nonfatal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1999-03, Vol.83 (6), p.945-948
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Yale, Acio, Elmo, Heo, Jaekyeong, Hughes, Eileen, Narula, Jagat, Iskandrian, Ami E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared qualitative assessment of exercise thallium imaging to quantitative assessment in predicting outcome in 713 patients with 78% prevalence of coronary artery disease by coronary angiography; during a mean follow-up of 52 months, there were 106 hard cardiac events (death or nonfatal myocardial infarction). The qualitative method provided important prognostic information; however, unlike the quantitative technique, less patients were assigned to either the low- or high-risk group and proportionally more patients into the intermediate-risk group, which may limit the clinical usefulness of the technique.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9149(98)01056-X