Phasic Voluntary Movements Reverse the Aftereffects of Subsequent Theta-Burst Stimulation in Humans
1 Department of Neurological Sciences and 2 Neuromed Institute, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy Submitted 30 April 2008; accepted in final form 10 August 2008 Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a technique that elicits long-lasting changes in the excitability of human primary motor cort...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2008-10, Vol.100 (4), p.2070-2076 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Department of Neurological Sciences and 2 Neuromed Institute, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
Submitted 30 April 2008;
accepted in final form 10 August 2008
Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a technique that elicits long-lasting changes in the excitability of human primary motor cortex (M1). Tonic contraction of the target muscle modifies the aftereffects of TBS, whereas interactions between phasic muscle contraction and the aftereffects of TBS are unknown. In this paper, we investigated whether phasic voluntary movements influence TBS-induced changes in M1 excitability. We examined whether a brief sequence of phasic finger movements performed by healthy humans before both intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) influences TBS-induced aftereffects. Ten healthy subjects underwent iTBS and cTBS. To evaluate the TBS-induced aftereffects on M1 excitability, single TMS pulses were given over the FDI motor area before (T0) and 5 (T1), 15 (T2), and 30 min (T3) after TBS. To find out whether finger movements influenced the TBS-induced aftereffects, we tested motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) size by single TMS pulses at T0, immediately after movements, and at T1–T3. We also measured the kinematic variables mean amplitude and mean peak velocity of the movements. When no phasic voluntary movements preceded TBS, iTBS elicited facilitatory and cTBS elicited inhibitory aftereffects on MEP size. Conversely, movements performed before TBS elicited significant changes in the direction of the TBS-induced aftereffects. iTBS produced inhibitory instead of facilitatory aftereffects and cTBS produced facilitatory instead of inhibitory aftereffects. Finger movements alone had no effects on MEPs size tested with single-pulse TMS. Peripheral electrical stimulation had no effect on iTBS-induced aftereffects. Repeated phasic finger movements interfere with TBS-induced aftereffects probably by modulating mechanisms of brain metaplasticity.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Berardelli, Dept. of Neurological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale dell'Università, 30, 00185 Rome, Italy (E-mail: alfredo.berardelli{at}uniroma1.it ) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.90521.2008 |