Computed Tomographic Angiography as a Screening Modality for Blunt Cervical Arterial Injuries: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUNDThe diagnosis of blunt cervical arterial injury (CAI) is made difficult by its infrequent occurrence and delayed presentation. Beginning in January of 1995, we used computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the neck to screen for CAI. We hypothesized that CTA could be incorporated into the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care Infection, and Critical Care, 1999-03, Vol.46 (3), p.380-385
Hauptverfasser: Rogers, Frederick B., Baker, Eileen F., Osler, Turner M., Shackford, Steven R., Wald, Steven L., Vieco, Pedro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDThe diagnosis of blunt cervical arterial injury (CAI) is made difficult by its infrequent occurrence and delayed presentation. Beginning in January of 1995, we used computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the neck to screen for CAI. We hypothesized that CTA could be incorporated into the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury as a screening modality for CAI and that CTA would increase the early detection of CAI. METHODSRetrospective review of all CAI for the years January of 1988 to June of 1997 at a Level I trauma center. CAI diagnosed before introduction of CTA (pre-CTA; January of 1988 to December of 1994) were compared with those after (post-CTA; January of 1995 to June of 1997). RESULTSThe overall incidence of CAI for the entire time period was 0.11%. Motor vehicle crash (53%) was the most common mechanism, with focal neurologic deficit (23%) or seizures (17.6%) the most common presenting clinical symptoms. CTA added only a few additional minutes to the time required for the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury in whom CAI was suspected. The incidence of CAI increased from 0.06% pre-CTA to 0.19% post-CTA (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test). CTA was associated with a decrease in mean time to make the diagnosis of CAI (156 hours pre-CTA vs. 5.9 hours post-CTA). In addition, CTA was associated with a decrease in the incidence of permanent neurologic sequelae from CAI (50% pre-CTA vs. 0% post-CTA; p = 0.07; Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONWe conclude that CTA does not significantly increase the time of the diagnostic workup of the patient with injuries caused by blunt trauma. The introduction of CTA at our institution was associated with an increase in the detection rate of CAI. Earlier detection of CAI may allow for more timely therapeutic intervention and potentially prevent permanent neurologic sequelae.
ISSN:0022-5282
1529-8809
DOI:10.1097/00005373-199903000-00005