A stepwise testing protocol for modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems to prevent pacemaker-implantable cardioverter- defibrillator interactions
Current use of newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has changed the spectrum of pacemaker–ICD interactions and provided new tools for testing and understanding those interactions. Testing for pacemaker–ICD interactions was performed in 31 procedures involving 22 patients. The protoco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 1999-02, Vol.83 (3), p.360-366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Current use of newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has changed the spectrum of pacemaker–ICD interactions and provided new tools for testing and understanding those interactions. Testing for pacemaker–ICD interactions was performed in 31 procedures involving 22 patients. The protocol included: (1) evaluation of pacemaker stimulus artifact amplitude and its ratio to that of the evoked ventricular electrogram, (2) testing for inhibition of ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection by the ICD during asynchronous pacing at maximum output, (3) evaluation by pacemaker event marker recordings of pacemaker sensing behavior while programmed to nonasynchronous mode during ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and (4) evaluation of postshock interactions. Inhibition of detection of VT/VF was found in 6 of 22 patients (27.2%). Large stimulus artifact amplitude (>2 mV) or stimulus artifact:evoked QRS ratio >1/3 had a positive predictive accuracy of 18% and 14.4%, respectively, and a negative predictive accuracy of 100% and 92.3%, respectively, for clinically significant interaction. Asynchronous pacing occurred in 16 of 31 procedures (51.6%), and was due to underdetection by the pacemaker in 4 of 16 (25%) and noise reversion in 12 of 16 (75%). Postshock phenomena occurred in 6 cases, 3 of which were clinically significant. Overall, 11 of 22 patients (50%) had clinically significant interactions discovered by this protocol, which led to system revisions in 6 and to pacemaker output reprogramming in 5. Thus, pacemaker–ICD interactions are frequently detected using a thorough and systematic protocol. Most cases can be managed by system revision or pacemaker reprogramming. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00869-8 |