Results of a Clinical Care Pathway for Radical Prostatectomy Patients in an Open Hospital – Multiphysician System

Objectives: The object of this study was to evaluate the results of a comprehensive clinical care pathway (CCP) aimed at reducing the length of hospitalization and overall cost for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in a setting including both academic and private physicians. Methods: The cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 1999, Vol.35 (3), p.210-216
Hauptverfasser: Gheiler, EdwardL, Lovisolo, JonA.J., Tiguert, Rabi, Tefilli, MarcosV, Grayson, Timothy, Oldford, Gregory, Powell, IsaacJ, Famiglietti, Gary, Banerjee, Mousumi, Pontes, J.Edson, Wood Jr, DavidP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: The object of this study was to evaluate the results of a comprehensive clinical care pathway (CCP) aimed at reducing the length of hospitalization and overall cost for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in a setting including both academic and private physicians. Methods: The clinical records of 1,129 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy by 24 urologists between July 1, 1990, and December 31, 1996, were reviewed. The factors considered were length of stay, morbidity and mortality, readmission rates, and average cost. The CCP was implemented on January 1, 1994. Its scope was to minimize preoperative evaluation, eliminate the preoperative hospital stay, standardize postoperative care and provide intensive patient education. Results: The average length of stay decreased significantly after implementation of the CCP (8.1 vs. 4.9 days, p = 0.0001). In 1990, there was a large difference in length of stay between academic and private physicians (8.3 vs. 12.6 days) (p = 0.02) but by 1 year after implementation of the CCP there was virtually no difference (4.69 vs. 4.71 days) (p > 0.05). Complication rates were similar before and after implementation of the CCP. Using the average 1993 cost/case as the baseline preCCP figure, the average cost of radical prostatectomy decreased by 16% in 1994 and by 22% in 1995. Conclusions: It is possible to successfully implement a CCP in a multi-physician system to reduce length of stay and cost of radical prostatectomy without subjecting the patient to a greater risk of complication.
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
1421-993X
DOI:10.1159/000019848