Laboratory Assay Reproducibility of Serum Estrogens in Umbilical Cord Blood Samples
We evaluated the reproducibility of laboratory assays for umbilical cord blood estrogen levels and its implications on sample size estimation. Specifically, we examined correlation between duplicate measurements of the same blood samples and estimated the relative contribution of variability due to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 1999-02, Vol.8 (2), p.147-151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We evaluated the reproducibility of laboratory assays for umbilical cord blood estrogen levels and its implications on sample
size estimation. Specifically, we examined correlation between duplicate measurements of the same blood samples and estimated
the relative contribution of variability due to study subject and assay batch to the overall variation in measured hormone
levels. Cord blood was collected from a total of 25 female babies(15 Caucasian and 10 Chinese-American) from full-term deliveries
at two study sites between March and December 1997. Two serum aliquots per blood sample were assayed, either at the same time
or 4 months apart, for estrone, total estradiol, weakly bound estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Correlation
coefficients (Pearson’s r ) between duplicate measurements were calculated. We also estimated the components of variance for each hormone or protein
associated with variation among subjects and variation between assay batches. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were >0.90
for all of the compounds except for total estradiol when all of the subjects were included. The intraclass correlation coefficient,
defined as a proportion of the total variance due to between-subject variation, for estrone, total estradiol, weakly bound
estradiol, and SHBG were 92, 80, 85, and 97%, respectively. The magnitude of measurement error found in this study would increase
the sample size required for detecting a difference between two populations for total estradiol and SHBG by 25 and 3%, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |