Two MER2-negative individuals with the same novel CD151 mutation and evidence for clinical significance of anti-MER2

BACKGROUND: MER2 (RAPH1), the only antigen of the RAPH blood group system, is located on the tetraspanin CD151. Only four examples of alloanti‐MER2 are known. We report here two new examples of alloanti‐MER2, in women of Pakistani and Turkish origin, one of whom showed signs of a hemolytic transfusi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2008-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1912-1916
Hauptverfasser: Karamatic Crew, Vanja, Poole, Joyce, Long, Shannon, Warke, Nicole, Colavecchia, Connie, Burton, Nicholas, Moulds, Marilyn, Schlanser, Gloria, Wilson, Laura, Noumsi, Ghislain, Moulds, Joann M., Moulds, John J., Daniels, Geoff
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: MER2 (RAPH1), the only antigen of the RAPH blood group system, is located on the tetraspanin CD151. Only four examples of alloanti‐MER2 are known. We report here two new examples of alloanti‐MER2, in women of Pakistani and Turkish origin, one of whom showed signs of a hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) after transfusion of 3 units of red cells (RBCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Standard serologic methods were used. A monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) was used to assess the potential clinical significance of one of the antibodies. All exons and flanking intronic sequences of CD151 were amplified and sequenced. A homology model for CD151 second extracellular loop (EC2) was constructed based on the crystal structure of CD81. RESULTS: RBCs of both patients did not react with alloanti‐MER2, and neither of their antibodies reacted with MER2‐negative RBCs. The MMA results suggested that the antibody that appeared to have caused an HTR had the potential to be clinically significant. Both patients were homozygous for a 511C>T mutation in CD151 encoding an Arg171Cys change. This change did not result in any significant structural rearrangement in the protein model. CONCLUSIONS: Two MER2‐negative patients with anti‐MER2 are homozygous for the same novel mutation encoding an amino acid substitution in the EC2 of CD151. One of the antibodies may have been responsible for an HTR, and crossmatch‐compatible RBCs should be recommended for transfusion to patients with anti‐MER2.
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01792.x